It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by darkbake
Of course they approve of tyranny, that's the whole point of their recent movement, they will not accept any other viewpoint but their own. That is when I abandoned ship and moved to a super conservative state (Idaho) even though I am fairly "liberal" to give myself a decent tyranny buffer.edit on 29-3-2013 by darkbake because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
reply to post by TauCetixeta
How do you quantify an abstract ideal? What is the scale they are using?
link
We score all 50 states on over 200 policies encompassing fiscal policy, regulatory policy, and personal freedom. We weight public policies according to the estimated costs that government restrictions on freedom impose on their victims.
“Freedom” is a moral concept. What most people mean by freedom is the ability to pursue one’s ends without unjust interference from others. Of course, reasonable people can disagree about what counts as unjust interference, and it is also controversial whether freedom in this sense ought to trump other desiderata such as social welfare. These questions cannot be answered in a value-neutral way, but citizens and policy makers must try to answer them nonetheless. We are forthright about our moral philosophy so that we can be precise about what counts as “freedom” for us, but we recognize that others may define freedom differently. We have made the data and weights available online so that people can alter our index to fit their own conceptions of freedom. We consider it an open, but interesting, question whether freedom is in any way related to indicators of aggregate social welfare such as income growth and migration.
Originally posted by TauCetixeta
reply to post by TsukiLunar
I think it is factual that the democrats attack prosperity with higher gas taxes in their
states....ie New York & California.
It is also factual that the democrats attack freedom to own a gun with gun laws that
only work on the noncriminals.
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Originally posted by TauCetixeta
reply to post by TsukiLunar
I think it is factual that the democrats attack prosperity with higher gas taxes in their
states....ie New York & California.
It is also factual that the democrats attack freedom to own a gun with gun laws that
only work on the noncriminals.
Oooooh taxes and gun laws! The horror! Im slitting my wrists in fear!
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by TsukiLunar
Not only is their definition of "freedom" subjective, they have completely omitted subjects such as reproductive rights, abortion and the death penalty, because they are controversial and can be seen from both sides (according to them). And of course, gun control is always seen as imposing on freedom, not guaranteeing the masses the freedom to live in a safe country (or state). Smoking restrictions are seen as anti-freedom. My freedom to breath fresh air in public is apparently NOT a freedom, according to this group...
Finally, there's economic freedom and personal freedom. A state can rank very highly on one, but it's standing is wiped out if they rank low on the other.
I'm not a Democrat or Republican, but after looking over this study, I can see that it's much more complex than a simple "Democrats have a problem with freedom" issue. That's a simple and "thought-free" way of stating the findings.
edit on 3/30/2013 by Benevolent Heretic because: (no reason given)