Jesus Christ was a Demigod

Originally posted by resoe26
Is it possible that Mary lied and did have intercourse out of marriage?
-This being why she lied, because she was not married and didn't want to get stoned?
---Or maybe its all a fable?

Or maybe she just had sex with her husband and the Romans some 200, maybe 300 years later added their own story with a bunch of fraudulant proof to support their testimony.

Originally posted by DarknStormy

Originally posted by resoe26
Is it possible that Mary lied and did have intercourse out of marriage?
-This being why she lied, because she was not married and didn't want to get stoned?
---Or maybe its all a fable?

Or maybe she just had sex with her husband and the Romans some 200, maybe 300 years later added their own story with a bunch of fraudulant proof to support their testimony.

Potential deception must be assessed which allows for truth to be refined thru the misguided data.

reply to post by Ophiuchus 13


That is what im looking for thank you for your contribution.

reply to post by STARTRUTH49


Anytime my friend

NAMASTE*******

well let us look for some other evidence here. i ask if anyone knows of others that have had someone in their lives that has had an imaculate conception (whether remembering an abduction experience or not) It has been documented, family members, Doctors, agents, government officials, friends...please be brave enough to share. Thank you


Let us open this truth from all sides so the world can see what is. Many of you have somthing to contribute

Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13

Originally posted by DarknStormy

Originally posted by resoe26
Is it possible that Mary lied and did have intercourse out of marriage?
-This being why she lied, because she was not married and didn't want to get stoned?
---Or maybe its all a fable?

Or maybe she just had sex with her husband and the Romans some 200, maybe 300 years later added their own story with a bunch of fraudulant proof to support their testimony.

Potential deception must be assessed

which allows for truth to be refined thru the misguided data.

edit on 3/25/13 by Ophiuchus 13 because: (no reason given)

I'm sure there are many logical explanations that could debunk this very fast but I guess there is barely any information from the time for a reason A prophet for sure but a god, jeez thats really pushing the limits.

Originally posted by STARTRUTH49
well let us look for some other evidence here. i ask if anyone knows of others that have had someone in their lives that has had an imaculate conception (whether remembering an abduction experience or not) It has been documented, family members, Doctors, friends...please be brave enough to share. Thank you

I've never had an experience or know of anyone who has been abducted by aliens. I have seen a strange light here and there but thats about it. The alien theory is unheard of in my part of the world though I'm sure some people may of had some experiences here and there.

The thread title would be correct according to the definition. Jesus would also be a messiah.

Originally posted by rickymouse
The thread title would be correct according to the definition. Jesus would also be a messiah.

Thank you, yes we need to remember that although abdubctions are common and so were these kind of pregnancies at some stage (documented) Jesus was somthing very different Indeed, he was the wayshower for man and Still is .

To say Yeshua was ET, is not new. James Gilliland says Mary was of the purest Lyra DNA here as well, so not just ET father, but also many ET markings in the mother. I don't know if that is true or not. Though anything Lyra interests me as I know it is part of my soul journey. So found that interesting what he wrote.

www.shirleymaclaine.com...

My grandmother who was a Christian all her life, and open minded, just years before her death at nearly 90, said, "Wouldn't it be something if Jesus was an ET!". She was quite interested in Ufology and had woken to being paralyzed with beings in her room as well as others in the family.

Irregardless if he was an ET (and I don't really know if he existed, but metaphor or real his message of love and helping others and not reacting or judging, and mercy, is the way back home and to higher levels/eutopias).

The problem is the word in the title: Demigod.

Demigods are fallen ones by my definition. Whereas if he was real, he was a Higher Up come into the world to free our minds.

According to Lou Baldin/Sleeper, Israel created Christianity to preserve Hebrew for their rebels caused their country to be sacked and destroyed basically, so that it is a metaphor for their religion. Paul created it and brought it to Rome. Seneca was there at the time, and Nero, and well, he was attributed to writing some similar things, so perhaps there was a tie in that way to what Lou's book.

Originally posted by STARTRUTH49

Originally posted by Def Youth
reply to post by rockoperawriter

 

Blah, blah, blah. You're just like them, shoveling your crap everywhere, arrogantly believing you have the answers.

The difference is im not trying to make others believe but when one looks at the evidence surrounding Jesus one starts to see the truth.

You started a thread about it.....Hence you are trying to get people to believe......Hypocrite

reply to post by Unity_99


yes I understand what you are saying and in part is correct. Son of man and son of God, even if the mother herself was what Jesus was, they still had in part flesh / human DNA this is what they shared with humanity. Thus christ overcame the human part and imortilized himself as a Higher being in flesh. I would say a Demigod is one whom has an earth father / mother and a sky Father/Mother thus Demigod, but a son of God should shurely grow to become a God, so thats not for me to debate here, but he certanly was a son of God and son of man.

Originally posted by Chrisfishenstein

Originally posted by STARTRUTH49

Originally posted by Def Youth
reply to post by rockoperawriter

 

Blah, blah, blah. You're just like them, shoveling your crap everywhere, arrogantly believing you have the answers.

The difference is im not trying to make others believe but when one looks at the evidence surrounding Jesus one starts to see the truth.

You started a thread about it.....Hence you are trying to get people to believe......Hypocrite

You probably havent read the rest of the comments have you ? Feel free to call me a hyprocrite I know it must be a release of inner healing for you to judge me and call me thus, hope it makes you better for that. Thanks for you contributing nothing positive to this topic.

Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13

makes you wonder what was is known by some

It did, until read this thread:

Debunking "UFO´s" in Bliblical Paintings

They've never debunked a thing. Those most definitely are UFO's being depicted.

Also, here:

www.abovetopsecret.com...
Ex-Vatican Translator, Mauro Biglino's Alternative Creation/Translation Theory

Mauro Biglino's literal translation shows that the Church is most certainly aware of ufology in the religion starting with the term Ruach. For the Hebrew language didn't even exist according to scholars, at the time of Moses, not even Aramaic then, though there is debate over what language they were speaking. But it was thought to be Amorite by some.

When Hebrew was formed, the vowel inserts create the word meaning and they don't exist. Linguists have to admit they are guessing, and there are 70 different possibilities for some of the words meanings.

But there are default words, from older languages, such as RUACH which is sumar.

It has a pictograph:

A picture at the bottom of this quote. That which causes wind on the water never meant, The Spirit of God.

He then said this, quoted from that post:

So, that is a thing we don't know what it is, let say we don't know it, so we can take it easy, but which decidedly hovers on the water.

---As we don't know what it is, we'll name it by borrowing the name directly from the Vatica, so that we won't go wrong.

If you read last editions of the “Lexicon Recentis Latinitatis”, published by the “:Liberia Editrice Vatican” where they insert the latin neologisms, you'll find that the Vatican inserted “navis sideralis”, which means “starship” They inserted “areia navis”, thus “airship”, they inserted “aireus viator”, that is “astronaut” and they inserted an acronym, “R.I.V” which means: res inexplicatae volantes”, that is UFO's.
---The ones of you that just saw that stuff now will realize that it's an unknown thing that hovers on the water.

So the Vatican identifies Ruach with UFO, and uses words "aireus viator" which = astronaut.

Originally posted by Unity_99
They've never debunked a thing. Those most definitely are UFO's being depicted.

They are indeed UFO's to those without any knowledge of the subject and a history of accepting any and every paranormal claim as fact.

Closed-mindedness works both ways.

reply to post by draknoir2


Actually there is no other definition. A thing is what it is. UFO's back in the past were not all government created or black op. Even if there were groups on earth that had UFO's and technology, and probably this is the case, those crafts were meant to traverse space, and the groupings were ET. Elohim were associated with the term Annanuki, though all of what is called Elohim not necessarily from one and the same groups. Its all cosmic.

Gears on Mars... visible from space.


Just sayin'.

That being said, and irregardles of Christ's DNA and potential hybrid status. To truly have grown up and remembered who he was and to have been One with Creator and Source, I'm not sure if he existed, ie not metaphor, yet if he even came close to those words or actions, then he would not be merely ET/Hybrid. Would have to run with a Huge Light Being on Mission from Beyond, our Heavenly home.

Et's are not out of the school yet, and aren't beyond yet, they are mixed polarities and all that.

This is not a denial of the thread. Higher Ups/Family, outside the universe/schools, are also ET's by the definition of extra terrrestrial.