It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rigel Kent
That is not what Bernanke said at all, the question at the FDOC was whether or not the problems of Cyprus could affect the financial markets and the response was that if there was some contagion that it could have an effect on the US markets,
nothing was said about taking American depositors savings, nothing, nada, zip.
Please get the facts and state them properly instead of going for WOW factor. I am in agreement that the US is in big financial trouble but falsely reporting stories on here will not help anyone.
PEACE,
RK.
Originally posted by surfin4it
REALITY CHECK - This thread is BS and FEARMONGERING (which goes over well on ATS, I realize)
The OP's source of the information "Silverdoctors" itself calls this "version" of Bernanke's comments a "translation". The "truth" isn't available, only their opinion. See below for the REALITY.
The Op is parotting what the source said, and the source (Silverdoctors) is clearly trying to inflame emotion in its readership. This "translation" of Mr. Bernanke's comments is nonsense.
Here are excerpts from yesterday's Q&A following Mr. Bernanke's statement, related to the Cyprus Bank Topic, from the Wall Street Journal's blog (reporter Sudeep Reddy) of the Q&A session:
BEGIN
1:49 pm Cyprus: It took 15 minutes to get to Cyprus and its reverberations, but we're there.
"It's a difficult situation in Cyprus," Bernanke says, outlining its many problems and the uncertainty about its implications for others in Europe after Cypriot lawmakers rejected a bail-in plan Tuesday.
"The vote failed and the markets are up today. I don't think the impact has been enormous. ... We hope the Europeans will come up with an efficient and equitable solution." The Fed is monitoring it, but so far doesn't see much risk to the U.S., he says.
2:16 pm Back to Cyprus: As a central banker, do you think it was appropriate or fair to impose a levy on every bank deposit, even the insured ones?
"I know they're grappling with a very difficult problem," Bernanke says. "I think the issue they face is there's a pretty big financial hole" -- a fiscal issue and a bank restructuring issue. "I think everyone understands there are certain risks with that" beyond hitting lower-income people and setting a precedent.
"There's probably no easy way to do it. We're going to keep monitoring that. But I don't envy them" with "that particular challenge."
2:21 pm The problems there don't have direct implications for the U.S. and would only become a problem if the runs became contagious, Bernanke says. Could a bank levy occur here? The FDIC created bank insurance in 1934 and has never lost a dime of anyone's insured deposits, Bernanke notes. "During the crisis the response of the government was in fact to increase the level," he says, adding that such a levy is "extremely unlikely in the United States."
END
So, the headline of this thread, and the source of the "translation" are BS. Although, the wild-eyed responses are very entertaining - thanks for these
edit on 21-3-2013 by surfin4it because: clarified wording
Originally posted by inverslyproportional
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
It didn't even take a week for the nations top financial criminal to suggest robbing OUR banks was possible too. Hmm... They give people many years in nasty federal prisons for doing that over just a few thousand dollars. He's already screwing us for 10's of trillions and now even suggests taking directly from people's pockets?
I'm starting to think they WANT a civil uprising. Maybe Obama WANTS to get himself into the same position of that President he thinks so much about. Lincoln. After all, had Lincoln lived after the war, he was in a position to make changes like were never possible before and have never been again since. Not to the degree that level of low position allowed.
Robbing AMERICAN bank deposits would likely see people getting shot... No kidding and no joke, in my opinion.
Has to be fake,
With all the debt from derivatives this should have all fallen apart years ago!
I have no money in banks to worry about..so don't look at me for such craziness. However, we live in a nation where people damn near kill each other over a shiny widget on sale for Christmas. This would simply blow things wide open.
How would a Federal Reserve Chairman be removed from his position anyway? There must be a legal process since the President appoints him and the Senate Confirms him. There is no way that can be a one way ticket with no way to cancel, is there?edit on 21-3-2013 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)
Did you read any of the twitter reactions to chase after their computers messed up and showed everyones accounts to have a zero balance?
I think that was the first step in trying to test for public reactions honestly. Too bad they were mostly things along the lines of, " my money better be back tomorrow, or I am gonna take it back".
I dont see a reason, when the country is already printing more money than we have in the bank every couple of konths, for them to take money from people.
Honestly, they shouldnt even tax us since they can simply print what they want without end.
It means they are only taxing people to keep the screws to them.as should seem obvious.
If I can make money at any quantity I desire, at any time of my desire, why woukd I need to take any from the people at all? The answer is simple, there is jo reason to, except to cause financial hardships on purpose. It is the only answer that makes sense.
I kean either money matters and is tangible, thus taxes are needed to pay things, or the government can print as much as they want, and have jo neex to tax the people.
It cant be both, as being both implies the entire system is fake, which means there is jo need to take anything from anyone to begin with.
"I know they're grappling with a very difficult problem," Bernanke says. "I think the issue they face is there's a pretty big financial hole" -- a fiscal issue and a bank restructuring issue. "I think everyone understands there are certain risks with that" beyond hitting lower-income people and setting a precedent.
Originally posted by OptimusSubprime
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
Wrabbit.... I think Bernanke is just poking a sleeping bear with a sharp stick. He has to know the reaction he will get by saying this, so I think he is just testing the waters. I want to see how many "Liberals" out there who support higher taxes will support this. Probably not too many since it will directly effect them.
To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures;