It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Planck satellite: Maps detail Universe's ancient light

page: 2
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 06:31 PM
link   
Dark matter being unveiled:

Biggest Map Yet of Universe's Dark Matter

Biggest Map Yet Of Universe's Dark Matter


Scientists have created the largest scale rendering of dark matter across the universe, revealing a picture of the invisible stuff thought to represent 98 percent of all matter in the universe. Dark matter has never been directly detected, but its presence is felt through its gravitational pull on normal matter. Scientists suspect dark matter is made of some exotic particle that doesn't interact with regular atoms.


Map of Cosmic Background Radiation:



Cosmic Background Radiation

Expanding Universe:

Direct Observational Evidence


Hubble demonstrated that all galaxies and distant astronomical objects were moving away from us, as predicted by a universal expansion.[18] Using the redshift of their electromagnetic spectra to determine the distance and speed of remote objects in space, he showed that all objects are moving away from us, and that their speed is proportional to their distance, a feature of metric expansion. Further studies have since shown the expansion to be extremely isotropic and homogeneous, that is, it does not seem to have a special point as a "center", but appears universal and independent of any fixed central point.



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 06:54 PM
link   
yeah because dark matter and energy is elivated conciousness. Its dimensions above the 4 elements we percieve. That's why it runs in the background. Darkness has always been higher vibration than light. Why, Because once we get to a certain point of vibration there is no more light, the energy becomes very hard to see... Hense darkness.



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 07:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by CrypticSouthpaw

Yeah sure there was a big bang that made the milkyway.

No, the Milky Way Galaxy wasn't formed from any kind of bang.
New insight into Milky Way formation

It formed at about the same time as all the other galaxies approximately 13 billion years ago.
Galaxies


Originally posted by CrypticSouthpaw

they will never ever find evidence a big bang started the universe. Never. Such a discovery will never be possible.

In actual fact there is lots of evidence, it's just that you distrust it.


Originally posted by CrypticSouthpaw

We Can't even see the center of the universe.... If there is even one.

You're right - there isn't one... Or it's everywhere - depending on your point of view...
Where is the centre of the universe?


Originally posted by CrypticSouthpaw

Yeah albert was somewhat right. but 1 #ing bang.... do you think Albert anticipated Deep space? No he did not.

Do you know what deep space is?



posted on Mar, 23 2013 @ 02:50 PM
link   
We're discussing this topic on ATS Live! tonight!

There are more details on the show in the link



posted on Mar, 24 2013 @ 07:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by Theflyingweldsman
reply to post by dowot
 


Hi Dowot,
This guy explains things pretty well using laymans terms

The Universe has to be flat to fit in with what they observe.
At the end of the day, no-one knows.
Thats why they call stuff "Dark energy" and "Dark Matter".

The speed of light is a constant in our Spacetime.
We are all moving at the speed of Light through Space and time.
Why does E=mc^2 ?
Our visible Universe is made of light, everything you see around you is moving at the speed of light.
But so are you, so you don't notice.

The ultra-rapid expansion of the universe created Spacetime.

Before Spacetime, there were no laws of physics to break.





I haven't "gotten" that yet. How are we moving at the speed of light? And that was a very good video, which is one reason I've "quoted" your whole post, to include the video which I'd like to recomend as well.



posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 12:33 AM
link   
reply to post by Aleister
 

well,

since energy is mass tmes the speed of light squared,

your energy divided by the speed of light equals your mass times the speed of light.

This means that if you are 80 kg going at the speed of light,

Thats the same as all the energy in every atom of you divided by the speed of light.

or, your 80 kg is (your total energy divided by the speed of light) divided by the speed of light.

(e/c)=m
c
So all matter is compressed energy, which would move at the speed of light if it could.

All that we see is a holgraphic reflection of light bouncing off the world around us.

Describe water to a fish....

Does that make sense to you?



posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 01:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by Insomniac

Originally posted by CrypticSouthpaw

Yeah sure there was a big bang that made the milkyway.

No, the Milky Way Galaxy wasn't formed from any kind of bang.
New insight into Milky Way formation

It formed at about the same time as all the other galaxies approximately 13 billion years ago.
Galaxies


Originally posted by CrypticSouthpaw

they will never ever find evidence a big bang started the universe. Never. Such a discovery will never be possible.

In actual fact there is lots of evidence, it's just that you distrust it.


Originally posted by CrypticSouthpaw

We Can't even see the center of the universe.... If there is even one.

You're right - there isn't one... Or it's everywhere - depending on your point of view...
Where is the centre of the universe?


Originally posted by CrypticSouthpaw

Yeah albert was somewhat right. but 1 #ing bang.... do you think Albert anticipated Deep space? No he did not.

Do you know what deep space is?


I still take all that evidence with a grain of salt, If mainstream acheology will state that said mountain volcanic rock is 13 million years old and appeared here during the jurrassic period well contreversly, We'ev found dinosaurs with skin still attached to them as well as feathers.

Now if this predicted date was anything close to accurate. No fleshed remains would be there after MILLIONS OF YEARS. That being said, When mt st helan errupted it spread sedimentary rock everywhere. Even tho it was carbon dated to 11 million years old It only appeared there a day or 2 ago. So that being said, Anything that is close to even being right would use radiactive iceitopes and calculate the half life number to get a rough estimation, Even then its quite flawed. So you see, I really don't care what people have to say about all of this scientist or not. Because To my observations it seems that up to 50% of the scientific discoveries that exist now will be somehow debated and debunked in the future as it always constantly is during its evolution...

So like i said, I take what those people got to say about how old the universe is and blah, and take it with a grain of salt, This is almost as bad as a meteorologist or a weather mans predictions.



posted on Mar, 25 2013 @ 02:57 PM
link   
Reminds me of this pic. . .






top topics



 
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join