Obama's 30 or so Former Israeli "Classmates" @ Columbia University Don't Recall Him - AT ALL!

Originally posted by POXUSA
I mentioned earlier that I wasn't a so-called 'birther.' AND this is most certainly NOT a 'birther' thread.

Except it IS a birther thread. Something birthers do is make up stories about what they claim Obama has done or not done - exactly like in this thread.

Still waiting for the reason you have sealed all your records exactly the same as Obama....

double post

Originally posted by kerazeesicko
reply to post by POXUSA

 

Show us where you are getting these quotes from? Is it a reputable reporting site...have they done other investigative stories?Or are they just Birther sites?

Its in there -

Originally posted by kerazeesicko
Is it a reputable reporting site...have they done other investigative stories?

Or are they just Birther sites?

Birther sites, as it is just the same old debunked birther nonsense.
200 birther court cases lost so far, 0 wins....

reply to post by POXUSA


If you're not a birther why did you say earlier that Arpaio had an air tight case? Arpaio's "case" revolves entirely around Obama's birth. What exactly does it matter if 25 students of a small demographic from a large school don't remember Obama? You keep saying what this thread isn't about, so what exactly is the message you're trying to get across with it?

Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by POXUSA

 

If you're not a birther why did you say earlier that Arpaio had an air tight case? Arpaio's "case" revolves entirely around Obama's birth. What exactly does it matter if 25 students of a small demographic from a large school don't remember Obama? You keep saying what this thread isn't about, so what exactly is the message you're trying to get across with it?

Looks as though the "Birth Controllers" are still trying to 'abort' this thread. BUT this 15 pg. thread is about something else - namely BHO's non-attendance @ Columbia, and its drawn a bit of attention for that very reason.

BTW - my position has always been that Obama is a TOTAL fraud - not merely a 'birth certificate' fraud, but he is fraudulent across the board in all respects.



I recently reprised the OP (See Below) just to remind the "birth controllers" what the thread is all about. And yes the good sheriff has BHO by the short hairs, and Arpaio certainly does have an airtight, foolproof case against the POTUS.......time to move on because this thread is not about Birth Control.

I know that there are many here who are attempting to sidetrack this good thread by mention of the birther - anti-birther issue and I would rather they didn't do it. This thread is about something else.

I mentioned earlier that I wasn't a so-called 'birther.' AND this is most certainly NOT a 'birther' thread. But unfortunately there are many here who are attempting to turn it into one.
It's better for the overall integrity of the thread If you were to stay on topic. As much as you'd like to label me a birther and to try to rename the thread as a birther thread you will not succeed in it.

Originally posted by POXUSA
Obama's 30 or so Former Israeli "Classmates" @ Columbia University Don't Recall Him - AT ALL! - By Judy Maltz | Mar.15, 2013 | 6:56 PM |

The Haaretz Daily article proves beyond a shadow of a doubt the true extent of the overall 'educational scheme' set up by the Obama handlers that allowed for such a fraud, and we must also realize that the true consequences (as in truth or consequences) of the main points in the article go far beyond just BHO's fraudulent enrollment at Columbia. Even just one big lie like this is a sure indication that the entire existence of BHO is a living myth.

We must also understand how important Columbia was to the educational fraud. There is an unexplainable meteoric rise to academic fame from community organizer to president. Following a short and shady stint @ Occidental - he ends up @ Columbia then on to Harvard. In other words Columbia was the 'ticket ' to Harvard, which was also a fraud. He did nothing at Harvard. Even as the president of the illustrious and noteworthy 'Harvard Law Review' (a spot traditionally given to the best writer on campus) he wrote nothing. This was the first time in Harvard's stellar academic history that such a thing was allowed to be. That means that the academic community is in on the fraud as well.

Sarah Palin is actually participating in the 'big lie' as well when she merely calls him out at the CPAC function in the weakest of terms by saying Obama "you lie," which mimicked another earlier shout out by Joe Wilson when - In a breach of decorum - Wilson pointed at Obama and shouted, "you lie!" twice. He attracted national and international attention for the incident. Palin would have been better to say "Obama, you are a liar" and then exposed him for what he really is - a big time fraud, and a fictional entity - a non person actually.

edit on 21-3-2013 by POXUSA because: txt

reply to post by POXUSA


If you'll notice I did ask questions about the topic. Questions that you have not answered. If this thread is not a birther thread in disguise, what is the point you're trying to make with this thread? What does it matter if 25 people from a small demographic at a large school do not remember a single person who by his own admission acted like a hermit during his years at Columbia?

Originally posted by POXUSA
This thread is about something else.

I mentioned earlier that I wasn't a so-called 'birther.' AND this is most certainly NOT a 'birther' thread.

No, it is a birther thread as you post birther nonsense like Obama's birth certificates certified by the State of Hawaii are forgeries....

But unfortunately there are many here who are attempting to turn it into one.

You turned it into one by posting birther nonsense! Birthers have lost every single court case, 200 of them as all you they have is nonsense! All you have is nonsense as well

Originally posted by Xcalibur254
If you're not a birther why did you say earlier that Arpaio had an air tight case? Arpaio's "case" revolves entirely around Obama's birth.

He said that as he is a birther, believing the birther nonsense about Obama.

reply to post by POXUSA


You state that Obama is a "total fraid", yet the article that was linked in the original post is about as relevant to that as the price of rice is on the planet Jujubee. As myself and others have explained, the fact that a specific subset of people (or PART of a specific subset of under 25 people, as it is) does not remember him is not a shocker in the least bit. You went on to state that nobody at all remembers him in future posts, which was shot down as quickly as you put it up.

We could stick with the original post subject of this argument, but there wouldnt be anything left to post about if that is the case. That argument has been smashed and thrown out. So now we're left with other bits and pieces, brought up by both you and others.

I would like to ask the moderators to please CLOSE THIS THREAD? Thank you...............

Originally posted by POXUSA
I would like to ask the moderators to please CLOSE THIS THREAD? Thank you...............

Why? Are you afraid the deep dark secret you are trying to hide by sealing all your personal documents exactly the same way Obama has will come out??

reply to post by POXUSA

Buddy, you should know by now that anything anti-Ubuma will signal the obamabots to attack. I applaud you on your truthful disclosure of the fraud kenyan-in-chief. obamabots attacking in 3....2...1...

Originally posted by POXUSA
I would like to ask the moderators to please CLOSE THIS THREAD? Thank you...............

You can't just close a can of worms once you've opened it. You best bet is to just let the thread fade away and live to fight in another thread on another day. You'll never win with the paid Obama cyber warriors. They will bait, derail, insult, distract or whatever just to get your goat. Just let it go and focus Obama's ongoing failures and lies that ooze out on a regular basis via his wide array of talking heads that do his dirty work.

The only reason he is currently in Israel is to try to rile up the leftists (what few there are) in Israel to support his agenda for Palestine. He was just speaking from Gaza with Abbas this morning to push for no occupation at the same time they were lobbing rockets into Israel. Perfect timing. Don't expect him to condemn this latest rocket strike. He never condemned the last barrage back in November. Hamas has a different Agenda than Obamas. Perhaps he will address the unrest between Hamas and Fatah. Doubt it!!

Neither side wants him there....

Nobody is forcing others to like the guy. Hell, I dont think he's done the greatest job by any means. I was a fan of Clinton, the first Bush, and Reagan. I started out as a fan of Obama, but now, I'm on the fence on many things that deal with him.

What I (and others) have a problem with is misrepresentation of facts and outright fabrications that are made in the name of character assassination. Dislike a guy because of the job that he is doing, thats cool. Make up and/or promote completely fabricated statements because they fit the way you feel, regardless of the fact that they've been proven wrong? That is not the right thing to do, whether it be dealing with Obama, Bush, Ron Paul, or any other person on this planet.

reply to post by flyswatter

Please explain why the department of health services in Hawaii would OCR a scanned birth cert: they did not do so in all the birth certs i have seen.
The Dept only validates that their copy is a valid copy... see Onakas signature, via stamp, at the bottom of any scanned copy of a hawaiian birth cert. What would the purpose be of OCRing by them? can you cite any published procedure by health services that would result in OCR of a birth cert?

raising the possibility of an OCR is not the same as a probability

Just as valid as me raising the possibility that you and hello bruce are disinformation trolls. I have no evidence, but by golly, it is possible!!!!! can be said of anyone on ATS,
PLease base your comments on evidence, not opinion

Originally posted by darkstar57
reply to post by flyswatter

 

Please explain why the department of health services in Hawaii would OCR a scanned birth cert: they did not do so in all the birth certs i have seen.
The Dept only validates that their copy is a valid copy... see Onakas signature, via stamp, at the bottom of any scanned copy of a hawaiian birth cert. What would the purpose be of OCRing by them? can you cite any published procedure by health services that would result in OCR of a birth cert?

raising the possibility of an OCR is not the same as a probability

Just as valid as me raising the possibility that you and hello bruce are disinformation trolls. I have no evidence, but by golly, it is possible!!!!! can be said of anyone on ATS,
PLease base your comments on evidence, not opinion

Why would they use OCR? My guess would be because the use of OCR would allow these documents to be searched by way of any text on the certificate rather than only by the name of the file itself. It would allow the data from a certificate scanned with OCR enabled to be imported into a searchable database. With OCR, you have a document with recognized words; without OCR, you have an image, thats it.

As far as specifically why they do it? You're going to have to ask them. I dont work there, dont have their policy manuals (not sure you could get one). I am simply familiar with the technology and how it works, and that it can easily produce layers. Anyone claiming that it is NOT capable of doing so is incorrect.

**EDIT**
I dont know how familiar you are with the technology, but you need to keep in mind that OCR vs. non-OCR scans is often as simply is checking a box in the settings of the software being used. While the software may be complicated under the hood, the ability to turn that setting on or off is not.

reply to post by flyswatter

I confess to wasting too much time reading about how the dept of hawaaii heatlth services works .
They already have a database. it was the basis for printing out the first Obama certification of live birth... green laser printer copy. it is filled in by data from a database, does not contain any images. it is printed from the database, on green paper, mailed to the requestor...
the "long form birth cert, on the whitehouse dot gov site as a pdf, is supposed to be a scanned copy of an actual book of birth certs, e.g., the Nordyke twins, you can see it is a scan of a page from an actual bound book of certs. you can also see the bending of the page on the left of the obama original birth cert scanned copy.
the 9layers of the PDF file do not reflect any ocr algorithm. How would you explain the cute little smiley face added in tiny dots to the A in onakas signature, or the two parts of the serial number, which are the same typeface, but different resolutions... and are on different layers.

Please actually look at the nine layers before you continue debating this. you will wonder where your self delusion came from. but maybe you do not want to know.

Originally posted by darkstar57
reply to post by flyswatter

 

I confess to wasting too much time reading about how the dept of hawaaii heatlth services works .
They already have a database. it was the basis for printing out the first Obama certification of live birth... green laser printer copy. it is filled in by data from a database, does not contain any images. it is printed from the database, on green paper, mailed to the requestor...
the "long form birth cert, on the whitehouse dot gov site as a pdf, is supposed to be a scanned copy of an actual book of birth certs, e.g., the Nordyke twins, you can see it is a scan of a page from an actual bound book of certs. you can also see the bending of the page on the left of the obama original birth cert scanned copy.
the 9layers of the PDF file do not reflect any ocr algorithm. How would you explain the cute little smiley face added in tiny dots to the A in onakas signature, or the two parts of the serial number, which are the same typeface, but different resolutions... and are on different layers.

Please actually look at the nine layers before you continue debating this. you will wonder where your self delusion came from. but maybe you do not want to know.

What I have stated about the technology is not something that is debatable - OCR is absolutely capable of producing layers. Did it actually produce the layers seen in his birth certificate? Never said it did, because I dont know. Is the birth certificate legit? Cant say with certainty, havent examined it first hand. If you go back and actually look, my point of contention was someone saying that OCR software cannot produce layers; that statement by someone else was absolutely incorrect.

You seem to want to drag what I've said into a completely different aspect of all of this, one which I never did make a comment about. You've got some idea that I am debating the authenticity of the document itself. What you've said above changes absolutely nothing about the accuracy of what I said. You may be right about some of the things you said up there, but why do you insist on putting words in my mouth, and why do you insist on fabricating my side of an argument that was never made?