Ancient prophecies point to Pope Francis being the last

reply to post by FraternitasSaturni


That helped me gain some perspective on the situation FraternitasSaturni and it was done to the point and concisely.

Also to DarknStormy you`ve had me running off and surfing the net,trying to play catch up,good doogs dude.

reply to post by DarknStormy

Originally posted by DarknStormy

Well the thing with Nostradamus prophecies are that they are not meant to be taken literally as most who have studied or read them know. For the 1-99-9 king of terror, some things could be done.. How about 9-11-1? The king of Terror was and still is Osama Bin Laden.. But thats just an example and I'm not saying thats what the prophecy meant either.

I was reading a Nostradamus site and came across their 9-11 possible interpretation (Quatrain 10-72) which says similar to yourself here,with added interesting info on the dates.

In the year 1999, in the seventh month,
from the sky will come the great King of Terror,
bringing back to life the great King of the Mongols.
Before and after, Mars to reign by good fortune.
www.nostradamususa.com...

My thoughts on this are,if this is referring to the events of 9-11, we don`t know (us average day people) what happened in 1999 that Nostradamus may have seen,maybe thats when the plan for 9-11 came in or was finalised.

Obviously the great King of Terror would be the terrorists which brought back to life a ruthless warmonger,which in my opinion is the NWO not a particular person.

Kind of like,the false prophet giving power unto the beast,which has been and is out there devouring anyone (countries/dictators) who isn`t playing their game.

Originally posted by SilentKoala
Still trying to salvage this rubbish eh? The Malachi prophecy failed epicly so we're turning to Nostradamus instead?

Anything to strike fear into the hearts of the fearful!

Now, I have been wondering ever since he was elected. I realize you aren't supposed to try to squeeze events to somehow fit a prophecy... but in terms of the Nostradamus prophecy. I do believe the last pope is supposed to in someway be involved with the phrase, "Peter of Rome," correct? Is there anything in this Pope's past or the current string of events that can somehow be related to the phrase, "Peter of Rome?"

Originally posted by Dextraphite
Now, I have been wondering ever since he was elected. I realize you aren't supposed to try to squeeze events to somehow fit a prophecy...

I think that applies more so to biblical prophecy,where Nostradamus is a bit of a different kettle of fish for mine,living in an era of persecution at the breathe of being accused of witchcraft was the reason he wrote how he did,then to top it off once finished with his writings he threw them in the air and gathered them in to no particular order,so its a puzzle,at least thats what I`ve been led to believe.

but in terms of the Nostradamus prophecy. I do believe the last pope is supposed to in someway be involved with the phrase, "Peter of Rome," correct?

No not correct.

The link I posted from the MSM has coupled the two (Nostradamus and Saint Malachy) which is leading to this confusion,the quotes from the two I posted on the first page Here

reply to post by gps777


Ah! Thank you much for the clarification! I am going to read that right now.

reply to post by gps777


Ah so in other words, the mangling of Saint Malachy's and Nostradamus' may have actually helped the prophecy be accomplished. I'm not sure if I get how it all fits in to Nostradamus' but if it does indeed.. then this: I have always been told the last Pope would be somehow Peter of Rome. And I believe that is for some reason the common believe and it's commonly attributed to Nostradamus. If this is the case, the Bishops would have been aware of this, and consciously or subconsciously chosen someone who can have no possible relation to the phrase Peter of Rome. And by doing this made Nostradamus' prophecy, which from what I can tell at this late hour you believe has been fulfilled?

Is this a correct line of thinking? And pardon me for missing anything you said, or misunderstanding. It's late where I am.

Originally posted by Dextraphite
reply to post by gps777

 

Ah so in other words, the mangling of Saint Malachy's and Nostradamus' may have actually helped the prophecy be accomplished. I'm not sure if I get how it all fits in to Nostradamus' but if it does indeed.. then this: I have always been told the last Pope would be somehow Peter of Rome. And I believe that is for some reason the common believe and it's commonly attributed to Nostradamus. If this is the case, the Bishops would have been aware of this, and consciously or subconsciously chosen someone who can have no possible relation to the phrase Peter of Rome. And by doing this made Nostradamus' prophecy, which from what I can tell at this late hour you believe has been fulfilled?

Is this a correct line of thinking? And pardon me for missing anything you said, or misunderstanding. It's late where I am.

Thats pretty much the gists of it I think Dextraphite and how the MSM are also spinning it by combining the two.

"Peter the Roman" is for me a sticking point,but we`ll have to wait and see,what comes out of this.

I don`t believe anything has been fulfilled as yet,its a lot of speculation, I`m really just supplying material for open discussion as this could become relevant to the prophecies that we`ll come to see later,but either way this is the first time in history a Jesuit has been elected,making interesting times to watch.

The main points I`m watching for, are the Comet Ison,later this year (Nostradamus),with the so called last pope (Saint Malachy).

And learning from others input.

reply to post by gps777


Well then I shall await your continued input!

reply to post by Dextraphite


For all we know, Nostradamus could of got hold of that prophecy and based his predictions around them. It was around the time they were discovered I think and with that, Nostradamus did have some friends high in the ranks of society. I know its far-fetched but its also possible. Around the same time Nostradamus was in his last days, The Jesuits were also coming on to the scene.

reply to post by gps777


Have ANY ancient prophesies been right?

Originally posted by lacrimoniousfinale
reply to post by gps777

 

Have ANY ancient prophesies been right?

Even if they were, do you think you would know about it?

Originally posted by lacrimoniousfinale
reply to post by gps777

 

Have ANY ancient prophesies been right?

Just a clarification: Both st Malachy and Nostradamus aren't "Ancient" - "ancient" is usually referred to the period from the hmmmm well the beginning of recorded history - you know with the beginning of writing etc with the cuneiform etc until the early middle ages around the 10th century - this is in theory, because in reality the term ends exactly when the middle ages begin - the last "ancient" term ends with "ancient rome".

St malachy is from the 12th century and Nostradamus is only from 500 years ago...

If I may add.

St Malachy doesnt consider 'Peter the Roman' as an agent of wickedness. He designates him as the Last Pope 'feeding his flock' until the end(judgment). The Antichrist/false prophets speculations are leaning on Reform era antiCatholic doctrines for those conclusions.

reply to post by gps777


This is very interesting to me. The part about "the city of seven hills will be destroyed". Do you know which city of seven hills he is referencing to?

I know that Lynchburg, VA is known for the "City of Seven Hills" which has 7 major hills.

This city is only 25 miles north from where I live. And, Liberty University is located in Lynchburg, VA. But, it is a baptist school.

yea know , screw this electing a pope deal , what they need to do is after they install a pope with a DNR tag hagging around his neck they need to install a vice pope that doesnt remember ww1 & will be able to run the church for ohhh say 60+ years before he hits the popes current age....... just sayin