It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
He had longed to be Pope. He has loved being Pope. He expected to die as Pope. Two weeks ago he announced in Latin he wasn’t up to it any more. Up to what? He spent most of his time writing and took time off to tinkle on the piano and stroke his cat.
Resignation isn’t in Benedict’s vocabulary. The real reason he has quit is far more spectacular. It is to save the Catholic Church from ignominy: he has voluntarily delivered himself up as a sacrificial lamb to purge the Church of what he calls ‘The Filth’. And it must have taken courage. Here is the remarkable thing you are seldom told about a papal death or resignation: every one of the senior office-holders in the Vatican – those at the highest level of its internal bureaucracy, called the Curia – loses his job. A report Benedict himself commissioned into the state of the Curia landed on his desk in January. It revealed that ‘The Filth’ – or more specifically, the paedophile priest scandal – had entered the bureaucracy.
Not surprisingly, some of the bureaucrats let off steam in unpriestly ways. Some are actively gay men who cannot normalise their lives with a partner because of Catholic teaching. They frequent discreet bars, saunas and ‘safe houses’. On another level there are individuals known to have a weakness for sex with minors. It appears the people who procure these sexual services have become greedy. They have been putting the squeeze on their priestly clients to launder cash through the Vatican. There is no suggestion that the bank has knowingly collaborated
In 2011, Dr Richard Sipe, a greatly respected world expert on the priestly abuse scandal, declared that only the Pope’s resignation would resolve the paedophile priest crisis. Sipe charged that ‘along with other bishops, Benedict was complicit earlier in tolerating and covering up the crimes of the priests’.
Originally posted by pheonix358
I think the article is trying to suck people in.
Benedict has been forced out, he is not part of the solution, he is at the very top of the problem and has been for decades.
What is being pushed by the Church is a supposed clean out with some sacrificial lambs being forced into retirement and then the Church will pop its head up and say, "There you go, all clean, squeaky clean, we are super clean."
It is slight of hand. Nothing will change. When I see Rome unlock the chests of gold under the Vatican and distribute it all to the child victims of brutal rape and sodomy, then and only then will I start, just start mind you, to perhaps believe that they might be changing their spots.
Hell will freeze over first.
P
He had longed to be Pope. He has loved being Pope
HPost
Benedict never wanted to be pope and he didn't take easily to the rigors of the job. Elected April 19, 2005, after one of the shortest conclaves in history, Benedict was, at 78, the oldest pope elected in 275 years and the first German in nearly a millennium.
Originally posted by silo13
Here it is in Huffington.
Your quote states:
He had longed to be Pope. He has loved being Pope
But, as I've read many times and here's at least one confirmation in English:
HPost
Benedict never wanted to be pope and he didn't take easily to the rigors of the job. Elected April 19, 2005, after one of the shortest conclaves in history, Benedict was, at 78, the oldest pope elected in 275 years and the first German in nearly a millennium.
So, at least one inconstancy - but still an interesting read!
peace
Originally posted by cody599
I think this is probably the most honest and scathing report I have read on this to date
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by cody599
I think this is probably the most honest and scathing report I have read on this to date
All he did was play on the piano and pet his cats?
The person who wrote that obviously hasn't seen Benedicts resume.
And Benedict 'longed for the job'?? I've read the exact opposite elsewhere.
As for the rest ... Benedict left because he couldn't do the job. He's old and sick.
His leaving means everyone in the curia loses their jobs.
But that doesn't mean they wont be re-appointed by the next guy ...
I give the article 50/50 ....
As I stated this is not necessarily my opinion. But I learned a lot by reading the article, to leave anything out would be remiss.
Originally posted by cody599
When a pope is is chosen does he have the right or ability to refuse the position ?
-
I think this is probably the most honest and scathing report I have read on this to date
Cody