Don't you find the term "White Genocide" hilarious regarding immigration in the UK/Europe etc?

reply to post by JustaWhiteMom


And in 1765? 1665? 1555? America is a relatively new nation settled by European invaders. It would be inaccurate to state that white Americans in America are as indigenous as say, white Britons in Britain.

reply to post by JustaWhiteMom


What's the point of being pro-White or pro-Black or pro-whatever? Surely it's just pro-Human now? If we go back to times of racial segregation, we would be regressing. Humanity cooperates - we are after all of the same species (unless you also dispute that now?). How on Earth do you think Humanity evolved to where it is now - by partitioning each other and cutting each other off?

reply to post by HomoSapiensSapiens


It's quite hard to believe that a black, African face can morph into a white face with angular features and straight black, blond, red hair in such a relatively short time frame, I suppose is what I'm driving at.

reply to post by CJCrawley


How is it a short time frame? You do realise that blond hair, red hair and whatnot are mutations, right? The same goes for blue eyes.

Search on it for yourself - nose features on an evolutionary level correlates with climate and whatnot. Or are you trying to say that White people are one human species (e.g. Homo Sapiens Sapiens X) and black people are of another species (e.g. Homo Sapiens Sapiens Y)? That's not the way it works. There are currently over 7 billion humans on the planet - not several species of human. The "racial" features that you view in people are but a minute part of genetic makeup - certainly not anywhere near anything to classify different people as being a different species.

reply to post by CJCrawley


What's more is that you do realise that white light skin is relatively new in relation to dark skin. White skin has not been around for as long as dark skin.

reply to post by HomoSapiensSapiens


You are being disingenuous yet again. There are black churches and Korean churches, and nobody says those are no good because they need "diversity." Why do you oppose Whites being allowed to have social space to ourselves just like every other race?

I think its because you are in favor of the genocide by forced assimilation of the white population.

reply to post by HomoSapiensSapiens


Why do you call Europeans who settled in America "invaders" but blacks who barge into Europe unwanted "immigrants"? Which is it?

Are you for open borders or not?

Originally posted by kerazeesicko
Also stop using selective arguments..it just shows how ignorant you are.

Violence happens towards other races by "whites" too, yet you never mention those. Why?..because it does not help your argument and shows the world that people in general are A-holes to each other.

There are "blacks" who also hate light colored or dark colored "blacks"...ignorance like yours know no culture, religious or sexuality lines..

I do not hate or care about much in this world...but racists get on my last nerve. Not just the "white" ones but all racists. I hate stupidity (ignorance) and the people who spread this BS..need to educate themselves instead of looking like complete morons.

So you want her banned because you dont like what she has to say eh?

What a phuquing gem you are.

reply to post by HomoSapiensSapiens


I do not consider White genocide to be progress as you so clearly do.

When are you going to demand that Native Americans give up their reservations because "segregation" is no good and we should all just be pro-human?

When are you going to write the Congressional Black Caucus and tell them it is narrow-minded and regressive to be "pro-black"?

You won't because you don't use those attacks against anyone but white people. You may say you are anti-racist but what you are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

reply to post by JustaWhiteMom


But even those black churches are not exclusively for black people - in other words, people of non-black skin colour can readily join if they wish.

On the opposite side of the argument, I could readily point out that there are many white churches too. The argument works both ways...

reply to post by JustaWhiteMom


But anything that is pro-black or pro-white is a minority and is not entirely important in the grand scheme of things - hence why they are not taken too seriously. Nobody takes the EDL too seriously anymore or Black Panther groups.

Originally posted by HomoSapiensSapiens
reply to post by CJCrawley

 

What's more is that you do realise that white light skin is relatively new in relation to dark skin. White skin has not been around for as long as dark skin.

All I can say is that out of africa nonsense, is just that. Nonsense.

There are 3 major races
The Caucasoid
Negroid
Mongoloid

And many sub species of those three

Ttuth is hard to swallow but it is just that, truth.

We are different and there is nothing y8u can say to change it.

reply to post by JustaWhiteMom


"Blacks" don't barge into Europe - European governments have readily opened their doors or relaxed controls for whatever reasons. What's more is that if in the prior centuries, The ancestors of Europe had not invaded the African continent and other people's lands, it is highly doubtful that immigration into Europe from Africa and whatnot would be at the scale that it allegedly is now. Many humans can be blamed - but blame cannot be limited exclusively to people of certain skin tones.

reply to post by arthurfonzarelli


How different are we talking here? If it were the case, a viable mixed race offspring would not be able to be reproduced - just like a Mule is infertile or a Liger.

Originally posted by HomoSapiensSapiens
reply to post by JustaWhiteMom

 

So you want a White School or a White church or something? Don't you just really want to live in the past? You now want the segregation of White people? Should white people have separate sinks from everybody now? Should white people sit at the back of the bus now? You do realise that the civilised world no longer works like that, right?

edit on 2/24/2013 by HomoSapiensSapiens because: (no reason given)

two words: black caucus

Why i said that well the black caucus are allowed to administer membership based on race. The world does work that way its just white people are not allowed to do it

how about "bet" or black entertainment television, united negro college fund ect ect ect

Just imagine how fast this thread would be closed if the users name was "Justablackmom" and was preaching black separatists/supremacy and anti-semitism at the same time.

This is a very heated topic, so I'm just going to share my experience and leave it alone.


I live within a primarily African American / Middle Eastern populous, right outside Detroit. I have no white neighbors, so my friends are obviously not white. I have worked extremely hard my whole life to attain my current employment / life style. Still, that makes no difference. My friends constantly badger and pick at me over this "white privledge" and "the white man is keeping me down" crap. My friends have this sense of entitlement that I have never had, like they deserve to be paid to not work, while make racial stereotypes towards me for being able to afford an "okay" lifestyle. Mind you, they dropped out of college and are unable to hold a job at a local fast food restaurant, because they prefer to party all night and sleep all day.

These friends of mine, who live with their parents, aren't allowed to have me over to their place, because it makes the family "look bad," according to their parents.

I have first hand experience of being racially profiled because I am white, while harboring no ill feelings. I understand that some individuals are brought up with hate indoctrination, while some are not and form their own opinions. To not notice the perpetual racism towards all cultures, including the Caucasian culture, is pure ignorance. Either that or you'be never been white in a primarily non-white population and are drawing conclusions from this "white privledge" racist drivel.

Peace.

reply to post by JustaWhiteMom


I am not for open borders, but one cannot blame people of specific skin colour simply because European countries have opened up borders at the whim of greedy conglomerates and commercial giants. New Labour did not encourage immigration to create a Multi-culti paradise out of the goodness of their hearts - profit and whatnot had to do with it; especially when trade was emphasised with countries where many of those immigrants were coming from.

reply to post by JustaWhiteMom


1. Why am I supposed to care what some random jewish guy says?

2. The only place it is cited is on white supremacist websites, so it's probably not even real.

reply to post by QUANTUMGR4V17Y


Nobody is disputing that racism exists against all types of people, including white people, dear me!

However, to then say that "White genocide" exists is completely ridiculous.