It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A mother and daughter newspaper delivery team who were mistakenly shot by Los Angeles police hunting for a fugitive former cop will get a new pickup truck courtesy of the department. LAPD Cmdr. Andrew Smith says the department's Chief Charlie Beck met with the women in their Torrance home Saturday to apologize and tell them he had arranged for someone to donate a new pickup truck Read more: www.foxnews.com...
Originally posted by CosmicCitizen
That is a nice gesture but if they obtained a lawyer it will be about three million short.
Originally posted by WanderingThe3rd
another reason why they should of just let him go back to the mountains.
NO one, i repeat NO ONE would of got hurt
now they have to go explain to all these families why they had to chase down this one man to bring justice to the world that doesn't care about him
so stupid
Originally posted by CosmicCitizen
That is a nice gesture but if they obtained a lawyer it will be about three million short.
Originally posted by Alora
I really hate how sue-happy this nation is BUT
BUT
If there are two people that deserve to win a fat lawsuit it's these two. Clean the LAPD's clock, ladies.
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
Why does an agency want someone so bad they just shoot random people w out a positive ID?
Then burn a place down around him, along with any evidence..........
WHY?
Something is NOT right
Originally posted by WanderingThe3rd
reply to post by captaintyinknots
true i did miss that.
what i did catch though was the fact police opened fire first.
big no no in my books
Originally posted by Kovenov
reply to post by xquietonex
I remember reading about the LAPD's operational snafu & wondered about this hypothetical: if the victims had been legally armed, returned fire & managed to diffuse the threat these officers erroneously perpetrated against them, would they face charges? Is it a requirement that a person allow himself or herself to potentially be injured or killed by law enforcement officials, all while knowing that you've aggressed against no one, much less violated any law?
I have yet to read about this line of inquiry in the MSM.edit on 13-2-2013 by Kovenov because: (no reason given)