It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ThinkingHuman
Originally posted by lasvegasteddy
reply to post by crankySamurai
i wonder how many are aware of the un's unesco heritage sites the UN currently holds right to protect and govern much of the worlds most treasured places "above ownership"
Who could possibly be opposed to UNESCO protecting these amazing sites? Not me, until I read what you said, that they grant themselves rights "above ownership".
I went to the website you linked but it does not say anything about that (surprise). Can you provide the source, please?
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by lasvegasteddy
Stop spreading crap.
They do not have the right to "govern" these areas.
All the world heritage committee does is address any problems that may come up with a heritage site, and provide resources or money for preservation as requested.
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by MrSpad
They are just a bunch of extreme conspiracy theorists who have bought into their party's anti-environmentalism stance. Because it is not obvious how much corporate communists love environmental initiatives.
You have to question the mental state of anyone who is anti-smart growth.
Originally posted by WaKingLieFE
reply to post by FirstCasualty
I've been down the fear based
paradigm that gets thrown at us constantly.
Originally posted by crankySamurai
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by MrSpad
They are just a bunch of extreme conspiracy theorists who have bought into their party's anti-environmentalism stance. Because it is not obvious how much corporate communists love environmental initiatives.
You have to question the mental state of anyone who is anti-smart growth.
Man I'm not sure where your coming from with all this stuff.
Originally posted by MrSpad
Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
Originally posted by MrSpad
I do not understand what is wrong with you people. The UN has no power over anything or anyone. The UN in fact is capable of do nothing, When you sign a UN treaty your own national laws always supersede it. Do you know why the UN has not power? Because it is just a building. Its members are nations that have their own agendas. They do whatever they want but, on occasion they come together to feed some starving people and give nations a nuetral place to talk. Beyond that it is helpless. Trust me I worked with those turkeys for awhile. Agenda 21 is a group of suggestions. Many of them good ideas but, none of the mandatory and even if they were the UN has no way to enforce things. Nations on a regular basis blow off the UN, the US included. So foe the last time if your afraid of the UN your wasting your paranoid fear and should use it on something else. Had nobody else here ever had the misfortune of working with the UN?
Nothing like UN peacekeeping force that has a bunch of nations that literaly have to call home to get persion to do anything. Hey we have enemy forces building on the southern gate, we need the Aussies and Pakis to reinforce it. Sure we just have to brief our home nations and get permission first. People afraid of a UN take over now that is a good laugh.
It is not a laughing matter. Your attempt to demean people who are aware of the issue doesn't fly with me.
www.reuters.com...
Hours after U.S. President Barack Obama was re-elected, the United States backed a U.N. committee's call on Wednesday to renew debate over a draft international treaty to regulate the $70 billion global conventional arms trade.
Just hours after the election - not significant.
Also:U.N monitoring our elections
NAACP petitions UN to stop voter-ID legislation in states
As for "peacekeeping" you want to congratulate them on a job well done?
Peacekeepers gone wild: How much more abuse will the UN ignore in Congo?
www.theglobeandmail.com...
The landmark 1996 UNICEF study The Impact of Armed Conflict on Children reported that “In 6 out of 12 country studies, the arrival of peacekeeping troops has been associated with a rapid rise in child prostitution.” A review eight years later concluded that prostitution and sexual abuse followed most UN interventions. “Even the guardians have to be guarded,” it concluded.
There is a difference between being afraid and desiring to stop evil from happening. You say UN has no way to enforce these things. Well, hand them the keys to the car and enforcement isn't necessary.
Their is no they. Their is not group of people that are the UN. You yourself are pointing out how they can not do anything right. Do you know why? Because their is no they. You could sign a UN treaty that declared nobody is allowed to say the word Hamburger. When everyone kept saying it do you know what would happen? Nothing because it has no power. Fearing Agenda 21 is like fearing even half of what is on ATS is real.
So you would be for a one world gov one world currency, one world flag, one world law?
Originally posted by CB328
No, who said anything about that? I don't want to allow business to cover the entire earth with condos, strip malls and strip mines.
Originally posted by JuniorBeauchamp
Originally posted by crankySamurai
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by MrSpad
They are just a bunch of extreme conspiracy theorists who have bought into their party's anti-environmentalism stance. Because it is not obvious how much corporate communists love environmental initiatives.
You have to question the mental state of anyone who is anti-smart growth.
Man I'm not sure where your coming from with all this stuff.
His comments are typical of the paid shills that are sent out to boards like this.
Originally posted by CB328
So you would be for a one world gov one world currency, one world flag, one world law?
No, who said anything about that? I don't want to allow business to cover the entire earth with condos, strip malls and strip mines.
Originally posted by Happy1
reply to post by lasvegasteddy
You can tell a subject is important when the shills start doubling up and viciously denouncing info as "crap".
If Agenda 21 isn't a threat, why would they bother jumping right in and getting vicious about it?