It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gwynnhwyfar
Those numbers of 20,000 and 30,000 impaled sounded so high to me that I had to go look up some stats on how many US troops have died in various wars. I found a nice summary on Wikipedia here.
No wonder those numbers sounded high when you look at the number of troops that died in Iraq and Afghanistan - "only" around 48,430 between the two since 2001 - over more than a decade. I guess we just aren't used to so many dying in our current wars as we apparently were in the past. Look how many died during the Vietnam war, World War I and II and the Civil War! So I guess back then, twenty or thirty thousand dead in one conflict must not have been so unusual, although dead + impaled seems to have been worth noting!
So hypothetically, how would a person kill a real vampire?
And how do we determine who is and who isn't really a vampire?
Originally posted by Grifter42
reply to post by Phantom traveller
Okay, let's say you're in a situation where you've killed a real live vampire, and they don't believe you? What should a person do if you've just got a vampire stabbed through the heart that's starting to stink up the basement and will cause a lot of unnecessary questions to be asked?
Originally posted by Phantom traveller
Originally posted by Grifter42
reply to post by Phantom traveller
Okay, let's say you're in a situation where you've killed a real live vampire, and they don't believe you? What should a person do if you've just got a vampire stabbed through the heart that's starting to stink up the basement and will cause a lot of unnecessary questions to be asked?
I just hope that this is a rhetorical question and you don't have a dead person in your basement.....
For the sake of conversation,you burn it or you bury it but without removing the stake from the heart.
In contrast, documents of Germanic, Saxon, and Hungarian origin portray Vlad as a tyrant, a monster so cruel that he needs to be stopped. For example, Johan Christian Engel characterizes Vlad as "a cruel tyrant and a monster of humankind".[38] Several authors and historians believe that this may be the result of a bad image campaign initiated by the Transylvanian Saxons who were actively persecuted during Vlad's reign and later maintained and spread by Matthias Corvinus.[26][38][39][40] It is conceivable that these actions were not beyond the Hungarian King since he had already framed Vlad Tepes by producing a forged letter to incriminate Vlad of coalition with the Turks; however, there is incontestable evidence, both in Romanian and foreign documents, including Vlad's own letters, that he killed tens of thousands of people in horrible ways.
Originally posted by Grifter42
What can one do if there's a cabal of secret vampires in high places that are both covering up the existence of vampires and trying to murder one's self?edit on 5-1-2013 by Grifter42 because: Edited for clarity.