It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Official announcement from the one people's public trust

page: 5
44
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 26 2013 @ 07:45 PM
link   
reply to post by hellobruce
 


We can't talk about it.

That's the ruling.

If you want to dig into it hardcore we'll have to do it off the forum.



posted on Feb, 27 2013 @ 01:39 AM
link   
WOW an OPPT thread the mods haven't shut down yet.
Here is some info i wanted to share.

wakeup-world.com...

It explains how the UCC filings worked.
Also:

A lot of people are saying on the internet that the OPPT isn’t lawful…
A lot of people say a lot of things on the internet.

As I noted in my previous article, UCC law is the domain of large corporations. Knowledge of UCC law is largely confined to high-end corporations, and only the lawyers groomed in those corporations are given any in-depth access to that knowledge or practical exposure to it’s workings.

OPPT Trustee Heather Tucci-Jarraf used to be one of them. She, and others who assisted her with the Paradigm Report investigations and structuring of the OPPT filings, have the requisite knowledge and experience to frame the filings in a way that turned a regulatory mechanism of the former commercial/slavery system back on its owners. And the result? The ‘True Bill’ UCC #2012114776 document (shown above) was successfully filed, which in UCC law is the equivalent of a criminal indictment including execution of sentencing.

(This filing can be obtained when you download all files from the www.peoplestrust1776.org).

Various “legal commentators” online are currently making proclamations about the OPPT filings based on an ‘outsider’ understanding of the UCC, presenting their opinions as facts, and concluding that the filings can’t possibly stand as law.

But opinions aren’t facts. And the fact remains: these filings were not able to be rebutted by any of the specialist lawyers from any of the world’s largest corporations; those who truly know how UCC works, and who stood to lose the most from those filings becoming law.

So if anyone genuinely intends to rebut the validity of the UCC filings, they are encouraged to enter…

“… a duly verified rebuttal of the DECLARATION OF FACTS UCC # 2012127914, point by point, with specificity and particularity, by duly sworn declaration, with their full responsibility and liability, under penalty of perjury under governing law, or any law so long as it is identified, and signed by their wet ink signature”

In the absence of a rebuttal, the UCC filings stand as law.

edit on 27/2/2013 by wycky because: add



new topics
 
44
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join