It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Havox
reply to post by 1PLA1
And did they talk about aliens flying around in the sky and landing on the moon..?
Originally posted by 1PLA1
Originally posted by Havox
What about long ago, when there was no way even the government could have that technology, don't you think there would be some written records from someone about what they saw..?
There are written records of what the ancients saw. Descriptions are in the Bible, in East Indian literature, Sumarian texts and probably many more. Not to mention folklore from around the world.
Originally posted by WhoKnows100
The illusion is created by a very small group of men who own all the "advanced" satellites that give us our impressions of what's up there. Every telescope available to 99% of astronomers still shows a pin prick of light just like the eyes do unaided, just brighter of course. So, understanding that this very small group is occultic should tell all of us that the illusion they've created is for their purpose, not ours. I truly wouldn't be surprised if we actually lived in a giant planetarium type space globe. I, along with 98+% of the population of this planet, could never prove otherwise. And that is a danger because a concerted effort by a very few high placed people could easily create whatever illusion that they like and the vast population would never know differently.
Originally posted by 1beerplease
reply to post by HattoriHanzo
It is possible, but probable?
think about this, a civilisation more advanced than us decided to create a digitally reconstructed universe from their understandings and the laws that govern it, all on a "computer". This super computer has enough computing power to run as many as 10 billion of these "universes" simultaneously. They did this too see just how life can create itself and what other answers they have yet not achieved. Now in this lifelike digital universe, eventually life will appear, and eventually they will evolve to ask the exact same questions their "creators" have asked......So they run a simulation, not knowing they are also in a simulation.... All up until someone trips over the power cord. Also time could be perceived on another level so a million of the simulations "years" could be a matter of minutes to the creator.edit on 8-12-2012 by 1beerplease because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
Originally posted by 1PLA1
Originally posted by Havox
What about long ago, when there was no way even the government could have that technology, don't you think there would be some written records from someone about what they saw..?
There are written records of what the ancients saw. Descriptions are in the Bible, in East Indian literature, Sumarian texts and probably many more. Not to mention folklore from around the world.
Yeah -- but the sky maps made by ancient astronomers are the same as ours, and their astronomy texts describe the same sky that we see. Other than those stories you mentioned (which could be their attempts at trying to make sense of unknown natural phenomena), the vast majority of ancient astronomer descriptions of the seem to match what we see today.
Also, sky descriptions and maps made by astronomers just 100 or 200 years ago match our skies today. Those astronomers don't seem to have seen things flying around their skies.
Galileo, for example, was a well-known observer of the sky and kept many records of what he saw 400 years ago. His sky maps and texts don't describe things flying around.
edit on 12/8/2012 by Soylent Green Is People because: (no reason given)
Have you seen the paintings some artists made in the middle ages? There are several that depict what can be construed as UFOs, actual flying saucers.
I don't think a lot of the astronomers of that time period spoke of strange things in the sky for fear of the Catholic Church. Just my opinion on that.