It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by observer
Clinton? Ah, no, it was Bush the first. Who trained bin Laden in gurella tactics to fight the Soviet menace? Bush the first. Who repeatedly dropped the ball when it came to dealing with terrorists? Clinton.
Whose fault is it, us. We keep putting these people in office don't we?
Originally posted by kramtronix
i don't think there is enough emphasis on CLINTON here. how can you blame bush 41 for saddam turning into a tyrant. who could have forseen that? no damn one. but while he was thumbing his nose at the UN, building his arsenol and killing his own people by the herds, clinton allowed the UN to made a joke of by not leaning on them. that's the problem here. clinton didn't even ACT like he cared about the bull# going on over there. it's distrubing!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by observer
Kram, I did not blame Saddam's tyranny on Bush the first. I place it on Reagan. The Reagan admin knew he was a tyrant but figured what the heck let's arm him anyway. Alex Haig even went on record saying "We know he's a Son of a bitch, but he's OUR SOB."
I'm not trying to claim sainthood for Clinton.. far frim it. But when you make accusations and throw stones throw them at everyone responsible, not just the one most convienent for your own personal ideology.