It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Arken
Originally posted by RedShirt73
Just thought I'd add the vid from the camera that had the better view of the explosion.
The strike happens between 23 to 25 seconds. If you notice at the 24 second mark there seems to be a long white cylinder on the right-handside about three quarters up on the side of the video. You can notice it just above the bright orange cone. At the 23 second mark nothing is there, then at the 24 second mark you see what appears to be a small white line that appears out of nowhere. Then the explosion at 25 seconds. Any Thoughts?
This is not a Boeing 757...
Originally posted by NONPOINT21
reply to post by Arken
What I don't understand is why nobody ever seems to mention the why there is no black boxes found there or the twin towers? C'mon this is impossible out of 3 planes not to find 1 black box to prove any of either sides claims. Maybe the towers crushed and disintegrated the twin tower black boxes but no way it would happen a 3rd time with the pentagon. I mean they find black boxes miles away from planes that crash in the ocean from current on the ocean floor or planes that crash into other in mid air, which would be a bigger area to find this box. Ask any FAA person and they will say the likelihood of not finding all 3 black boxes is impossible.
Originally posted by NONPOINT21
reply to post by Alfie1
That proves nothing to me. If it doesn't have concrete data then I could've thrown it in there after the incident to your knowledge. Its just too convenient for other crashes way more severe to have the the info intact. It's still fishy to me. How hard is it to prove me wrong? Just release concrete footage of a plane hitting the pentagon, I mean its only one of the most guarded places on earth. Shouldn't be too difficult for you to produce should it?