Still In Doubt About the NWO Agenda? Then Read This UN Paper!

I recently came across this leaked UN planning paper, dated September 2010 and I'll be honest, I was shocked just how open they discuss their future plans.

This paper should leave absolutely no doubt whatsoever that there are forces in this world intent on creating a one world government and reducing the world's population.

www.foxnews.com...

I can't copy and paste from the article so I'll link images taken from the pdf-



So, according to the paper, by 2050 the world's population will have almost doubled. Yet they believe the world will have to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 50% to avoid 'climate chaos'. This is the '50-50-50' challenge.



That section openly discusses the need for a global transformation and questions whether the current governance structure based on national sovereignty will be able to respond quickly enough? Removing national sovereignty and imposing a one world government is one of the main objectives of the NWO.

If this paper doesn't convince you, then how about this one-

www.un.org...

That paper opens asking the question-

What would it take to accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries?

You sometimes have to read between the lines to connect the dots, but it doesn't take that much to appreciate that the UN is working towards a one world government where their 'Rule of Law' will be applied the world over and national sovereignty will no longer apply.

They're just speaking in plain terms. They think there is an overpopulation problem and they think it's their duty to curb population growth. It's not scary or sinister. They are allowed to desire fertility decline in booming countries. They are not gods. We don't have to go along with it if we don't want to.

Yes, you are a bit late to this. My suggestion is that you do some research into Agenda 21. There are many threads and much information regarding their agenda.

reply to post by deessell


I think you've misunderstood. Everyone knows about the agenda already, he's just further clarifying it. It's not like he's coming out to tell everything this new news he's discovered.

id be pretty disturbed if we weren't planning for the planets future ..

only agenda here is survival

Originally posted by sitchin
id be pretty disturbed if we weren't planning for the planets future ..

only agenda here is survival

So you think one body should control the world and have global governance?

You agree that removing national sovereignty will help save the world as the UN believes?

Originally posted by Wonderer2012

Originally posted by sitchin
id be pretty disturbed if we weren't planning for the planets future ..

only agenda here is survival

So you think one body should control the world and have global governance?

You agree that removing national sovereignty will help save the world as the UN believes?

with respect i didn't say that....my take is they should be discussions concerning our planets welfare the document clearly addresses that .....rules will have to be brought in and countries will have to tow the line ...it is what it is..... if things are allowed to continue as they are ..they are going to be alot of hungry mouths to feed
this is everyone's planet our home ..it needs protecting ...we are in uncertain times

Here's another good quote to add to your source list.

In 1993, the Club published The First Global Revolution.[5] According to this book, divided nations require common enemies to unite them, "either a real one or else one invented for the purpose."[6] Because of the sudden absence of traditional enemies, "new enemies must be identified."[6] "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill....All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself."[

en.wikipedia.org...

Honestly, I would bet a big part of what determines people's thoughts on this depends on how old they are and whether or not they went to public schools.
The brainwashing has been all about creating good global citizens.

to avoid "agenda 21" ,,,we all keep propagating like bunnies until the worlds population becomes so immense that we start killing each other for food and water....sounds like a plan to defeat these evil NWO'ers, we'll show them who's boss

Originally posted by On the Edge
Honestly, I would bet a big part of what determines people's thoughts on this depends on how old they are and whether or not they went to public schools.
The brainwashing has been all about creating good global citizens.

yeah...good thing you said something, the last thing i would want to be is a good global citizen...damn public school.

However blatant it may be that the powers in the UN want a one world government this is a serious issue.

In the past when an area got over populated people would just move to another area with more space and live there. You can't really do that nowadays. With the world well on it way to an over populated state something has to be done to slow down the population growth. Now i'm not talking anything like genocide, but people have to start putting there brains together on this one.

The problem here lies not in lack of space, but in lack of airable land to gro things. Resources like food and water become much more scarce. The north american need to have everything fresh, and all the old produce thrown away will put extra strain on this aswell. Couple that with the fact that the worlds population will excede 9 billion in less than fourty years and we have a formula for the collapse of our civilization.

Originally posted by jimmyx

Originally posted by On the Edge
Honestly, I would bet a big part of what determines people's thoughts on this depends on how old they are and whether or not they went to public schools.
The brainwashing has been all about creating good global citizens.

yeah...good thing you said something, the last thing i would want to be is a good global citizen...damn public school.

Don't you see that the same people behind Agenda 21 and world government are the same folks aiming to decide who should live and who should die? That while they want to dictate to everyone else how they should live in 200 sq. ft. homes and not drive cars , they are living in mansions and flying their private planes and wanting the land to themselves.

The companies they own can pollute all they want, but they wouldn't want to even let regular human being burn fire wood to keep warm or waste a drop of water that is unaccounted for.

It's just all about their greed and psychopathic desire to control.

In general, people already care for their surroundings and want it to be preserved. There is a way bigger agenda in place that has nothing to do with common sense environmental issues at all.

But I won't waste my time trying to educate you. Obviously you are proud of your intelligence, so don't let me bother you.

Originally posted by sitchin

Originally posted by Wonderer2012

Originally posted by sitchin
id be pretty disturbed if we weren't planning for the planets future ..

only agenda here is survival

So you think one body should control the world and have global governance?

You agree that removing national sovereignty will help save the world as the UN believes?

with respect i didn't say that....my take is they should be discussions concerning our planets welfare the document clearly addresses that .....rules will have to be brought in and countries will have to tow the line ...it is what it is..... if things are allowed to continue as they are ..they are going to be alot of hungry mouths to feed
this is everyone's planet our home ..it needs protecting ...we are in uncertain times

With respect, the thread is about the UN wanting to remove national sovereignty and imposing global governance.

So, within the context of the thread, you can't just ignore that and declare we should be planning for the future because that is not in line with what the tread is about

Of course, I agree we should plan for the future, but that doesn't change the fact they want to impose one world government in their plans.

reply to post by Wonderer2012


That's right.

"We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent."

by:

James Paul Warburg
(1896-1969) son of Paul Moritz Warburg, nephew of Felix Warburg and of Jacob Schiff, both of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. which poured millions into the Russian Revolution through James' brother Max, banker to the German government, Chairman of the CFR
quotes.liberty-tree.ca...