It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thePharaoh
reply to post by reeferman
bro...where are those quotes from
they cant be real...i refuse to accept that
muslims say that they corrupted the word of god...but i never imagined something this blatant
Originally posted by DarknStormy
Originally posted by thePharaoh
reply to post by reeferman
bro...where are those quotes from
they cant be real...i refuse to accept that
muslims say that they corrupted the word of god...but i never imagined something this blatant
I checked out the one about having sex with children under 9 years old and it is there. The way Reeferman has said it though is not exactly correct though unless there is a word or two in there that pretty much means it is acceptable.
Our Rabbis taught: In the case of a male child, a young one is not regarded as on a par with an old one; but a young beast is treated as an old one.23 What is meant by this? — Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that.24 What is the basis of their dispute? — Rab maintains that only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw guilt [upon the active offender]; whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty [in that respect].25 But Samuel maintains: Scripture writes, [And thou shalt not lie with mankind] as with the lyings of a woman.26
It has been taught in accordance with Rab: Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day;
24 I.e., Rab makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred. Samuel makes three the minimum.
Originally posted by reeferman
its disgusting to even think that this is a conversational topic for one and that there are two different views for another.. not to mention we are reading from a "holy" book.
Originally posted by reeferman
so what we have here is..
1) if a child is unable to have/understand sex it is not pederasty
2) if the child meets the age standards then it does count as such because they can not accuse (throw guilt) the rapist because the child is unable to participate in sex.
3) the age at which it does count 9 years & a day
4) the age it does count according to "Samuel" is 3 years & a day.
Originally posted by reeferman
so what does this mean? it is ok to have sex according to this religion with a child under the age of 9 in one statement, and under 3 in another.
23. The reference is to the passive subject of sodomy. As stated supra 54a, guilt is incurred by the active participant even if the former be a minor, i.e., less than thirteen years old. Now, however, it is stated that within this age a distinction is drawn.
24. I.e., Rab makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred. Samuel makes three the minimum.
25. At nine years a male attains sexual matureness.
26. Lev. XVIII, 22. Thus the point of comparison is the sexual matureness of woman, which is reached at the age of three.
Israel are attacked all the time by Hammas, Gazza, Palestine, but because Israel have bigger guns and bombs and when they protect themselves they are made out to be the bad ones because it makes a bigger explosion.
"All things have been handed over to Me by My Father; and no one knows the Son except the Father; nor does anyone know the Father except the Son, and anyone to whom the Son wills to reveal Him. 28"Come to Me, all who are weary and heavy-laden, and I will give you rest. 29"Take My yoke upon you and learn from Me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and YOU WILL FIND REST FOR YOUR SOULS.…