It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by artnut
Please tell me why you would want to have them sealed in the first place? Why did Bush have them sealed as well?
Originally posted by froglegs79
Once we have the form letter, enlist our family and friends who may not be on ATS to send it also. Involve the media. What ever we have to do to start change.
Let me start:
Birth Cert (only because I am sick of birthers )
10-20 years of tax returns
Health History
College Grades (why not might be fun )
School Photo's from Grade school (just kidding, but I would love to see the photo's from the 80's]
In common usage, blackmail is a crime involving unjustified threats to make a gain or cause loss to another unless a demand is met.[1][2] It may be defined as coercion involving threats of physical harm, threat of criminal prosecution, or threats for the purposes of taking the person's money or property.
Blackmail may also be considered a form of extortion.[1] Although the two are generally synonymous, extortion is the taking of personal property by threat of future harm.[9] It is the use of threats to prevent another from engaging in a lawful occupation and writing libelous letters or letters that tend to provoke a breach of the peace, as well as use of intimidation for purposes of collecting an unpaid deb
Some US states distinguish the offenses by requiring that blackmail be in writing.
Originally posted by hellobruce
Originally posted by froglegs79
Once we have the form letter, enlist our family and friends who may not be on ATS to send it also. Involve the media. What ever we have to do to start change.
Let me start:
Birth Cert (only because I am sick of birthers )
10-20 years of tax returns
Health History
College Grades (why not might be fun )
School Photo's from Grade school (just kidding, but I would love to see the photo's from the 80's]
So you think that they will change the constitution to add those requirements?
Popular Amendment
One other way of amendment is also not mentioned in the Constitution, and, because it has never been used, is lost on many students of the Constitution. Framer James Wilson, however, endorsed popular amendment, and the topic is examined at some length in Akhil Reed Amar's book, The Constitution: A Biography.
The notion of popular amendment comes from the conceptual framework of the Constitution. Its power derives from the people; it was adopted by the people; it functions at the behest of and for the benefit of the people. Given all this, if the people, as a whole, somehow demanded a change to the Constitution, should not the people be allowed to make such a change? As Wilson noted in 1787, "... the people may change the constitutions whenever and however they please. This is a right of which no positive institution can ever deprive them."
It makes sense - if the people demand a change, it should be made. The change may not be the will of the Congress, nor of the states, so the two enumerated methods of amendment might not be practical, for they rely on these institutions. The real issue is not in the conceptual. It is a reality that if the people do not support the Constitution in its present form, it cannot survive. The real issue is in the practical. Since there is no process specified, what would the process be? There are no national elections today - even elections for the presidency are local. There is no precedent for a national referendum. It is easy to say that the Constitution can be changed by the people in any way the people wish. Actually making the change is another story altogether.
Suffice it to say, for now, that the notion of popular amendment makes perfect sense in the constitutional framework, even though the details of effecting popular amendment could be impossible to resolve.