The real solution: Do Not Vote, revoke consent... PEACEFULLY

Originally posted by ErgoTheConclusion
If you are misunderstanding what the OP is saying, look at it like this:

Would horses seeking to be able to roam free and naturally succeed by voting for a new ranch owner who is promising to make improvements to the ranch?

edit on 18-10-2012 by ErgoTheConclusion because: (no reason given)

You are on the correct line of reasoning. I'll take it the next step and ask, if the horses were shown that residence on the ranch were simply a matter of consent (choice), but to live outside the ranch meant that they could not drink from the trough and could not eat the hay, would those horses (who universally and incessantly whinny about freedom) allow themselves to see that they have chosen and continue to choose a slave's existence? Or, would they demonize the horses that have decided to leave and who have the impudence and gall to whisper the truth through the fence-rails?