It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Overturning a common law dating back to the English Magna Carta of 1215, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Hoosiers have no right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes. In a 3-2 decision, Justice Steven David writing for the court said if a police officer wants to enter a home for any reason or no reason at all, a homeowner cannot do anything to block the officer's entry.
Gov. Mitch Daniels has signed into law a measure that allows homeowners to use force when resisting police entry into their homes in some cases. The bill was a response to the public uproar over a state Supreme Court ruling that residents could not resist officers, even during an illegal entry. The measure specifies that residents are protected by the state's self-defense law if they reasonably believe force is necessary to protect themselves from unlawful actions by an officer.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Cops go too far..of course some do...Court is where that is settled after a try to Internal Affairs gets results or gets a laugh and a hang up. However, I absolutely DO NOT want to see the ability to KILL those society puts in a place of keeping order based on 330 MILLION different judgments and concepts of what is 'justified'.
Not only is that aspect insane on the face of it....but just HOW bad and HOW brutal would people LIKE the cops to become anyway??
What does everyone expect Police attitudes to be toward the public as a whole after, say, a few of their brethren were shot to death under THIS law and..gee.. damn, sorry about that. OOPS...
Originally posted by AdamOver
Again, let me rephrase that "What does everyone expect Citizens attitudes to be toward the Police as a whole after, say, a few of their brethren were shot to death...."
Originally posted by AdamOver
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Cops go too far..of course some do...Court is where that is settled after a try to Internal Affairs gets results or gets a laugh and a hang up. However, I absolutely DO NOT want to see the ability to KILL those society puts in a place of keeping order based on 330 MILLION different judgments and concepts of what is 'justified'.
Your police are getting away with Murder left, right and center. We don't have guns over here. But thankfully we don't, yet, have 'those society puts in a place of keeping order' shooting dogs and people like its a sport.
Not only is that aspect insane on the face of it....but just HOW bad and HOW brutal would people LIKE the cops to become anyway??
Let me rephrase that.. "but just HOW bad and HOW brutal would Cops like People to become anyway." - Considering the lack of recourse the public inevitably has.
What does everyone expect Police attitudes to be toward the public as a whole after, say, a few of their brethren were shot to death under THIS law and..gee.. damn, sorry about that. OOPS...
Again, let me rephrase that "What does everyone expect Citizens attitudes to be toward the Police as a whole after, say, a few of their brethren were shot to death...."
I find it quite disheartening that someone could be against a law that could protect (at least a little) rightful Citizens from feeling safer in their homes.
Truly a strange view, and I don't even live over there.