It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hardamber
The first reference to a "bastard" in the Bible is in relation to the offspring of the fallen angels mating with human women.
Jesus did have an earthly father, it was Joseph. His real biological father was God himself. So, that base is covered. It does not state in Scripture that an illegitimate child can not enter into Heaven.
Jesus has the blood of a former prostitute and an adulterous father in his geneology. It is an example of God's grace and mercy, which is something that is sorely lacking in that other "faith."
Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
reply to post by tony9802
Thanks tony9802 but I feel it was a religious ignorant remark especially if he wont point out where he read it to enlighten many.
“The ignorant Christians burn the Quran and don’t understand that the result will be that Jesus becomes an illegitimate child.”
Originally posted by WhiteHat
“The ignorant Christians burn the Quran and don’t understand that the result will be that Jesus becomes an illegitimate child.”
That was funny.
Jesus life was long over and the New Testament was complete when the Quran was written; they didn't contribute with anything to the compilation of the Bible or to the Jesus story. They twisted their own version of an existent gospel, probably to get more credibility for their new prophet. And now they pretend to be somehow contributed to the "legitimacy" of Jesus.
I wouldn't waste my time following statements like these.
Originally posted by WhiteHat
“The ignorant Christians burn the Quran and don’t understand that the result will be that Jesus becomes an illegitimate child.”
That was funny.
Jesus life was long over and the New Testament was complete when the Quran was written; they didn't contribute with anything to the compilation of the Bible or to the Jesus story. They twisted their own version of an existent gospel, probably to get more credibility for their new prophet. And now they pretend to be somehow contributed to the "legitimacy" of Jesus.
I wouldn't waste my time following statements like these.
Originally posted by Sailor Sam
reply to post by tony9802
Let us have a definition of "bastard" as it is stated in parsi hebrew and arabic.
If they all revert to mean "a child born outside of marriage", then what the ayatollah said is true.
Joseph and Mary were not married were they, just "betrothed to be married"?
If Jesus is indeed the son of god, then he is not the son of Joseph, even if Joseph and Mary were married at the time of his birth, he could be considered a "bastard".
It is a very technical question, take emotion out of it and lets look at the evidence.
edit on 25-9-2012 by Sailor Sam because: (no reason given)