Still think a levitating disc (aka. UFO) is an impossibility?

Think again

Levitating a few inches in the air and shooting across the sky are two completely different animals...

Originally posted by boncho
Levitating a few inches in the air and shooting across the sky are two completely different animals...

It is about the principle, not how far we/humans have gotten with it (at least on the public domain level if you know what I mean). As an example of where we can go with tech that has been suppressed for decades, check out the Keshe Foundation's pursuits and technology.

How is this new news ?

People have been levitating superconductors for years .

Originally posted by PartyBROS
How is this new news ?

People have been levitating superconductors for years .

It is absolutely not. Superconductors have been discovered around 100 years ago. BUT, it seem like an alien concept for some reason for a whole LOT of people.

reply to post by betheflow


A common demo of superconductors, this has been a standard show and tell since the late 80's when hi temp superconductors were all the rage.

The Avro car even flew, not well but it did fly. I don't think anyone thinks that is an impossibility.

en.wikipedia.org...

reply to post by betheflow


Way cool link, wonder how true the technology they boast is.

reply to post by betheflow


Just my .02, I don't think the issue is whether a disc can be levitated or not - the issue is whether we have created technology that has been hidden from the public for security or other reasons or whether aliens have travelled billions or trillions of miles to tag our wheatfields.

Well i thought it was cool....not seen anything like that before.

Thanks for posting it.

CX.

Originally posted by bphi1908
The Avro car even flew, not well but it did fly. I don't think anyone thinks that is an impossibility.

en.wikipedia.org...

What's this got to do with levitating superconducters? The vehicle in your link is powered by conventional combustion engines.

Originally posted by betheflow
As an example of where we can go with tech that has been suppressed for decades, check out the Keshe Foundation's pursuits and technology.

1) If it's readily available on mainstream media sites such as youtube, it's not "suppressed".
2) If you believe a youtube video is proof of anything other than the gullibility of some people, you are mistaken.

I don't believe the major point of argument regarding "UFOs" is the often reported 'disk' design.

It's got more to do with establishing that the observed phenomena was, indeed, caused by a physical object (especially in the case of lights).

Then one runs into the difficulty of proving this physical object to be of an origin other than our own planet (or at least human development).

There are a lot of cases that leave one scratching his/her head, saying: "I really have no idea what that could be."

Could such cases be aliens? Sure. Why not?

Could they be natural phenomena we currently have no model for? Sure. Why not?

The problem is that when you cannot explain what something is - it is not proof positive of anything.

reply to post by john_bmth

Originally posted by bphi1908
The Avro car even flew, not well but it did fly. I don't think anyone thinks that is an impossibility.

en.wikipedia.org...

Originally posted by john_bmth
What's this got to do with levitating superconducters? The vehicle in your link is powered by conventional combustion engines.

Absolutely nothing except this thread isn't about superconductors. This thread is about levitating flying disks as the title clearly states: Still think a levitating disc (aka. UFO) is an impossibility?

My post answers his question with a no, there have been many people who did not think a levitating disc is an impossibility and as a matter fact have been experimenting with them for 60+ years. How those experiments have gone is up to a lot of speculation but the human race has made flying discs levitate long before this TED conference.

Super Conductors are hypothetically one means of UFO propulsion but it is not the only means. Clearly conventional combustion engines are another, not a great one but still another option.

As these craft are unidentified we do not know the occupants nor their means of propulsion.

Originally posted by betheflow

Originally posted by boncho
Levitating a few inches in the air and shooting across the sky are two completely different animals...

It is about the principle

You are 100% correct, and this completely invalidates your entire thread. The principle being used has certain requirements. These requirements prohibit it from ever levitating across the sky, or anywhere that is not a specially prepared platform.

Claiming this proves UFO's is like using a hovercraft to do the same. You might as well use a magnet to repel another magnet and exclaim PROOF! Sadly your video does the opposite of what you wanted, it disproves UFO's as any levitation must follow specific rules of physics.

The Nazi's built many flying disks for Hitler.

www.bibliotecapleyades.net...
en.wikipedia.org...
www.unmuseum.org...
greyfalcon.us...

These things were very UFO like. They did zoom across the sky. They didn't run on gas. They were very unconventional for the time and widely known technology. Or at least that's how the story goes. Is it possible the Germans were working on these and perhaps even have perfected some of them? Yes. Did they really? Who knows.. dead men don't talk.

Is it believable? Yes. Our government has stealth bombers, super sonic jet fighters and other high tech craft they developed for use in war under cover of secrecy that the American people didn't find out about until years after they were in use.

reply to post by JohnPhoenix


"Is it unbelievable? Yes", but that's largely because you have yet to post a credible source for your claims.

Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by JohnPhoenix

 

"Is it unbelievable? Yes", but that's largely because you have yet to post a credible source for your claims.

Didn't you even bother to read my post? None of those sources will tell you out right these things were real. I made it clear in my post that these things may not in fact be real. I guess you missed it.

I posted it because it was interesting reading relating to the topic at hand.

reply to post by JohnPhoenix


So what exactly is the point of posting up information you admit to be false?

"The Nazi's built many flying disks for Hitler."

Sounds awfully like an assertion, except now you're saying they didn't.

"These things were very UFO like. They did zoom across the sky. They didn't run on gas. They were very unconventional for the time and widely known technology."

Again, sounds awfully like an assertion, except now you're saying they didn't. Remind me what the point of playing "make believe" in a science forum is?

Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by JohnPhoenix

 

So what exactly is the point of posting up information you admit to be false?

Again. Reading comprehension 101. How many times do I have to go over this with you John?

I posted it because it was interesting reading relating to the topic at hand.

I AM trying not to be overly rude in the face of your last attack on me. (www.abovetopsecret.com...)

The point is that many people have been working on the problem of flying disks for many years, top scientists who do believe these things are possible. That it is in and of itself not an impossibility only that we may or may not have the technological know how to make one work yet. Of course.. I didn't have to exactly say that in my post.. it is implied. People with 5 grade reading comprehension skills ( I thought that included everyone on ATS) already understand that.