It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
ionaparamedia.50megs.com...
What do imaginative children, passionate lovers, dreamers, psychonauts, telepaths, bliss-bunnies, UFO abductees, shamans and neo-shamans, birthing mothers and babies, near-death experiencers, and schizophrenics have in common? The same thing Tibetan, Taoist and Kabbalistic masters, meditators, mystics and religious prophets share. Their brains are flooded with natural psychedelic pineal secretions that tenaciously cling to their synaptic junctions, electrifying their whole being with multisensory virtual stimuli, experiential beliefs and delusions about the nature of reality.
Originally posted by Komodo
reply to post by Druscilla
no ..
THAT particular encounter was NOT at the age of 5 LOL.. and of course in my OP of my thread I linked to you doesn't state what age I was.. I was 18.
but anyways...no need to try and convince a mind that is already closed...
TTYL.. see you on the boards..
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
reply to post by Rubicant13
Our brains have the ability to see, hear, smell and feel things that are not there. Each and every one of us can hallucinate. Our own bodies produce '___'. This is one of the most powerful hallucinogens known. This has been detected in people having a near death experience. We experience it's effects every night when we dream. Healthy functional brains produce this and has nothing to do with your conception of psychology. This is physiology. Measureable and detectable. The effects are profound. When we consider events that happen while sleeping, you have to understand that this stuff is there.
ionaparamedia.50megs.com...
What do imaginative children, passionate lovers, dreamers, psychonauts, telepaths, bliss-bunnies, UFO abductees, shamans and neo-shamans, birthing mothers and babies, near-death experiencers, and schizophrenics have in common? The same thing Tibetan, Taoist and Kabbalistic masters, meditators, mystics and religious prophets share. Their brains are flooded with natural psychedelic pineal secretions that tenaciously cling to their synaptic junctions, electrifying their whole being with multisensory virtual stimuli, experiential beliefs and delusions about the nature of reality.
Originally posted by swan001
reply to post by ZetaRediculian
Misunderstanding of internal stimuli. You mean, me seeing 2 years into the future with dead accuracy is misunderstanding of internal stimulis? That me affecting (with witnesses) electrical devices are misinterpretation of internal stimulis? Isn't more likely than instead of a "massive hallucination", those things could actually be real?
Let me give you an example. Some are daltonic, meaning they don't see colours right. Does that mean that colours don't exist? No. Yellow colour has a very define wavelength, 600 nm. Some people might be able to see it exactly as it is. I am one of those people who saw behind the stage's curtain.
Originally posted by Druscilla
reply to post by Komodo
Still, besides the point you were 18 years old, or 5 years old, or even if you were 28 years old, grabbing a machete because you hear a strange noise then waving it around in the face of your best friend because they want to look out a window is not rational behavior.
Besides that, you were 18, so, you should have known better! How does an 18 year old get so worked up and freaked out over some silly spooky sound outside their window? Why does an 18 year old sleep with a machete?
Was this during the great zombie outbreak of (insert date here)?
I doubt it, since there have been no recorded zombie outbreaks.
It's still a horrifying blood chilling confession of appalling behavior no matter what age you were when it happened.
You hear a strange noise, so you freak out and start waving a machete around at people?
Originally posted by Rubicant13
reply to post by Druscilla
So, these sources who have provided relevant and tested pieces of evidence have to be parapsychologists? I don't think so.
Originally posted by Rubicant13
reply to post by Druscilla
My arguing point is that discounting someone's experience as for sure some form of trick of the imagination as cited by these sources you have provided, is not always the gospel truth. If you take a side, and do not explore the other, you have no way of verifying the real truth.
Originally posted by Rubicant13
reply to post by Druscilla
Get some equipment for yourself, and go investigate claims of reported paranormal phenomena for yourself.
Originally posted by Rubicant13
reply to post by Druscilla
My only point that I disagree with you, Druscilla, is that taking a claim of such experiences by others and lumping them with the many out there that have either been debunked or are not taken seriously is not a good approach. Explaining and not suggesting that their experience was nothing more than psychological as the only answer to the experience in and of itself is an arrogant assumption.
Originally posted by Rubicant13
reply to post by Druscilla
After all, you have relayed the watch idea as a way for those who believe they have been abducted to verify their claims. This would be a way for you to test the waters for proof for yourself, to disprove the claims of those that have had paranormal experiences, right? If you do not wish to test the waters, you will always argue one side of the issue and never truly know if maybe really is something else out there beyond the 5 senses, and hence, the human psychological framework of mind.
Originally posted by starheart
I encourage all those that have contact with an alien species, or had an experience with them, to not fear of being ridiculised, and to come forward and relate their experiences.
Originally posted by Druscilla
With respect, to those of you that disagree, and/or make hostile comments in counterpoint to my non-hostile matter-of-fact statement with links; I've read your beliefs, listened to your stories, as well as your reasons for feeling the way(s) you do (in general, in this thread and the many others like this), thus, I ask, without being hostile, please prove how open minded you are as many are want to claim, and read through at least 2 of the links I've posted.
Schizotypy isn't necessarily a 'bad' thing.
There is such a state as "Healthy" Schizotypy:
Although aiming to reflect some of the features present in diagnosable mental illness, schizotypy does not necessarily imply that someone who is more schizotypal than someone else is more ill. For example, certain aspects of schizotypy may be beneficial. Both the Unusual experiences and Cognitive disorganisation aspects have been linked to Creativity and academic achievement. Jackson proposed the concept of ‘benign schizotypy’ in relation to certain classes of religious experience, which he suggested might be regarded as a form of problem-solving and therefore of adaptive value. The link between positive schizotypy and certain facets of creativity is consistent with the notion of a "healthy schizotypy", which may account for the persistence of schizophrenia-related genes in the population despite their many dysfunctional aspects.
I encourage those unfamiliar with, or biased against Psychological classifications to educate yourselves.
"Crazy" is not a clinical designation, but a societal perception.
Schizotypy in some ways, considering the creative aspects associated with healthy subjects, could be like having Synesthesia which is actually quite a wonderful and fascinating condition.