It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As a side note, the 101'st is not a true airborne division. Yes they use the moniker of airborne and plenty of guys are airborne qualified, but they don't really conduct true airborne operations.
Taken offense so easily? I assume you think I was taking a dig at the 101stPersonally I don't really care about division rivalries. Also, if I would have chosen to extend active duty time I would have definitely had the Air Assault course in my contract. Seeing how come time to be promoted to senior leadership qualifications take more and more precedence.My point was more directly referred to the OP in regards to Spec Ops not being in use by the American military currently. And yes Air Assault may be more effective in the current type of combat we're engaged in, but if there comes time to invade a competent country you would definitely see airborne ops used to seize an airfield and set up insertion points.
Originally posted by 31Bravo
reply to post by GD21D
As a side note, the 101'st is not a true airborne division. Yes they use the moniker of airborne and plenty of guys are airborne qualified, but they don't really conduct true airborne operations.
Really? What would you classify Air Assault missions then? Hover Borne?
Air Assault is more effective to date since Air Borne Soldiers are barely used. That is a fact. Last time para troops were used was in 2003 and it wasn't even a real combat jump. They were used more in the Gulf War, however, Air Assault is still used in places in Afghanistan.
United States Combat Jumps
edit on 24-8-2012 by 31Bravo because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ChrisF231
A friend today told me that the US Army's 10th Mountain Division is just a normal light infantry division and they have no actual mountain warfare capability akin to the German Gibrigsjagers, Italian Alpini, French Chassuers Alpins, etc. Basically the "Mountain" name is retained for historic/ceremonial purposes. I have also found out that the same situation applies to the 82nd & 101st Airborne Divisions - certain units have jump training but the majority of personnel are not airborne qualified.
Is this true? Why in the world did we give up large scale airborne assets and our entire mountain warfare capability? I mean we are fighting a war in Afghanistan - one of the most mountainous terrain in the world