Dr Sal is correct? NASA's Atlus V is ready for launch.

Hello everybody.

Just thought i would bring this article to everyone's attention in regards to Dr Sal's, what I believe to be bogus claims... But if you did believe him, here is a little evidence that may support his beliefs.

A NASA mission to investigate the radiation belt cleared for launch.


www.nasa.gov...

It would be good to know if anyone new any information in regards to the NASA mission.

Cheers

I thought we agreed that he is an actor?
Second line, same as the first

reply to post by dashen


Maybe the real Dr Sal wrote the script?!

reply to post by dashen


Maybe the real Dr Sal wrote the script?!

reply to post by sirjunlegun


Ah! Got me!. Ok, I'm back on board. So lets put on our tinfoil underwear and get ready to be fried by some Van-Allen Radiation!

reply to post by australianobserver


I tried to watch that video but stopped when I noticed that he was reading a script, not recounting his life. I have listened to professionals recall their careers before and he was not very good at pretending to do that.

Yes, i agree with you entirely.... But it did peak my interest when i stumbled upon this news brief this morning.
And i think it is worth making it known. It's probably nothing but coincidence.

Originally posted by Mkoll
reply to post by australianobserver

 

I tried to watch that video but stopped when I noticed that he was reading a script, not recounting his life. I have listened to professionals recall their careers before and he was not very good at pretending to do that.

How close minded do you even have to be to not be able to look past the fact that he looks like an actor? Since when does "acting" automatically equal "lying"? If I were acting but spoke my true feelings, wouldn't it still be my feelings?? Now if I were acting out someone else's feelings, sure, they are not mine, but does that mean nobody else has or had them??

What if this guy was paid for, what if indeed he is acting, but telling us something someone else wanted him to say? Why would an actor risk his career like that if it weren't for someone asking him to do it for money? On top of that, why would a whistleblower expose himself and risk his own life, when it's easy as going on youtube, looking up someone who acts, contacting him, sending him a check and have him read a script???

Why do you people automatically dismiss what he says, simply because it was discovered he is an actor? I know plenty of actors that play roles that fit them, but people think that's not who they truly are simply because they are known actors, what a load of crock, seriously. If a heartbroken actor plays a heartbroken character, it doesn't matter if you know he's playing a character, you still don't know he actually IS heartbroken.


I don't know if this guy was legit or not, but the hypocrisy is amazing at times;

"whistleblower uses real name"; bullsh*t, he would've been killed by now for exposing the truth!!!

"whistleblower uses an actor"; bullsh*t, we found out he's an actor so the message is a lie too!

Some people really have a lot to learn, so it seems It didn't surprise me, when his identity first came out, that people jumped on it instantly calling it a load of bs, and it doesn't surprise me now either, but seriously, learn to think for 5 freaking seconds before you word vomit and call it done, behind EVERYTHING there is more than meets the eye, you're not really denying ignorance when all you do is call bs after 5 seconds of evaluating things now are you



Can you people just think for 5 seconds please; In what way would this 'act' be beneficial to an actor if not for the money he got in exchange for it? Is he planning to solicit a job as a "dramatic truth exposing scientist" in an up and coming 2012 movie or something?? Because I don't really see where else you would want to show yourself predicting impending doom on this planet, and on top of that, if it were an act simply for the act, wouldn't he put it in the description or something? Wouldn't he say something in the lines of what his character is etc?? Perhaps he is trolling, I leave that open as a possibility, but there are other possible explanations.

reply to post by ThisIsNotReality


That is exactly what I saw in Dr Sal.
A paid actor,... paid by a true informant.
His original video is full of true information.

Many paid shills/trolls successfully derailed the original post, that's why I was waiting to make my first comments until now.

Frank Vidal's (aka Dr Sal) confession.

Originally posted by australianobserver
Yes, i agree with you entirely.... But it did peak my interest when i stumbled upon this news brief this morning.
And i think it is worth making it known. It's probably nothing but coincidence.

The mission information was available before the Dr. Sal video was made. So were questions about the Van Allen Radiation Belt collapsing. Looks like someone pulling bits and pieces of information off the net to make a somewhat realistic video.

Does anyone really sincerely believe that NASA needs to use the Dinosaur rocket launching technology to find out what they need to know?
They most likely know what's going on since at least 50 years.

The paid actor who acted for the mysterious informant made a second video with the confession because the story in his original video turned out to be TOO VIRAL and had to be stopped! Regardless of how much truth or not truth was in there.
There was a scent of true PANIC in the air !!!
Thanks God the whole story is now successfully extinguished.

Dr. Sal researched his hoax. Perhaps he read about this scheduled launch to study the belt.
An explanation about the mission can be found here, link

Here is a bit about the study.

The mission features nearly identical twin probes, each carrying a suite of advanced instruments to help scientists monitor and characterize changes within the radiation belts.

"The Radiation Belt Storm Probes will give us a better understanding of how the radiation belts actually work, and allow us to do a better job of predicting and protecting against the radiation that's up there in the future," said Mission Systems Engineer Jim Stratton, also of APL.

I found the mission info interesting. Why did you have to title your thread in such a way. The info, while rather loosely tied to the "doc's" hoax, doesn't need the sensationalism to catch my attention.

I think I'm going to start a hoax.

THE SLEESTAK'S JUST ATTACKED MY PUMPKIN PATCH BECAUSE THEY'RE SUPER-RADIOACTIVE DUE TO THE VAN ALLEN BELT DROPPING TO THE EARTH!

Dr. Sal is a sleestak from the lower fourth density.

reply to post by australianobserver


Maybe the true Scienctist didn't want to come out in public w/ his face...sooo, he hired an actor so his life won't be in danger for giving us the heads up?

Just a thought

reply to post by ThisIsNotReality

Some people really have a lot to learn, so it seems It didn't surprise me, when his identity first came out, that people jumped on it instantly calling it a load of bs, and it doesn't surprise me now either, but seriously, learn to think for 5 freaking seconds before you word vomit and call it done, behind EVERYTHING there is more than meets the eye, you're not really denying ignorance when all you do is call bs after 5 seconds of evaluating things now are you

Granted, proponents of speculation without proof based on what they want to believe, shored up by a whole web of other speculations, are entirely within their right to live in whatever fairy land they choose to live in.

It's like watching a group of 10 year old children pretending to be smarter, wiser, and more knowledgeable than they are, and if by some chance an adult comes along and tells the children the universe doesn't work that way, well, the children think they know better because, well, it's their fairyland with rules they've made up or agreed on.

I say, we've had our say, and regardless of what gets said, the children will play according to whatever rules it is they've set out for themselves that makes these imaginative universes they live in possible. They won't accept or understand anything contrary, because that would spoil play time.