It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

FBI Memo: "Military authorities are seriously considering the possibility of interplanetary ships"

page: 2
20
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 18 2012 @ 12:37 AM
link   
The Govt. trying to cover something up, no way!!! They can only hide the truth for so long. You know the saying, When it rains it pours! The day will come....



posted on Aug, 18 2012 @ 01:45 AM
link   
Nice historical stuff !

Thanks for sharing!



posted on Aug, 18 2012 @ 06:53 AM
link   
reply to post by PrimitiveWorld
 


Agreed. It is almost "supernatural" how the world hadn't come to this realization 30 years ago. We are being visited. It is a fact, and yet somehow the world's best kept secret.



posted on Aug, 18 2012 @ 03:36 PM
link   
 

 


Please join us tonight on ATS LIVE RADIO where we will be discussing this topic! Please visit THIS THREAD for the schedule of topics!

We would love to have you call in and voice your opinion regardless of what it is!

ATS Live Is Broadcasting * Today @ 9:00 PM EST

 

 



posted on Aug, 18 2012 @ 08:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by EvilSadamClone
Considering something is not the same as making one's mind up about any given topic.

And that's a problem with things like this, is there seems to be an insinuation that once something's been decided it should never change under any circumstances.

And this was before Project Blue book, which concluded, perhaps wrongly, that there isn't anything worthwhile to investigate.



Yeah you're probably right. I'm sure we're completely alone in an infinite universe. Totally makes sense. And that speed of light issue, I'm convinced there's no way around it because we Earth humans have been bangin away at this "science" thing for a couple hundred years so of course we know everything already.

ETA Bluebook was a sham.
edit on 18-8-2012 by Urantia1111 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 18 2012 @ 09:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by greeneyedleo
 

 


Please join us tonight on ATS LIVE RADIO where we will be discussing this topic! Please visit THIS THREAD for the schedule of topics!

We would love to have you call in and voice your opinion regardless of what it is!

ATS Live Is Broadcasting * Today @ 9:00 PM EST

 

 


Thanks for the plug, Leo. Just caught the segment on ATS Live. Overall not a bad treatment.



posted on Aug, 19 2012 @ 06:06 PM
link   
reply to post by Orkojoker
 


Good thread Orko and I'd never read that document before so many thanks for posting it.


This U.S. Government document about the Swedish Air Intelligence Service also mentions that some reliable and fully technically trained people have concluded these phenomena are 'obviously the result of a high technical skill which cannot be credited to any presently known culture on earth' and that was back in 1948.

Although more soberly worded, always thought this was an important one as well where the Assistant Director Scientific Intelligence Marshall H. Chadwell writes to the Director of the CIA informing in that 'sightings of unexplained objects at great altitudes and travelling at high speeds in the vicinity of major U.S. defense installations are of such nature that they are not attributable to natural phenomenon or known types of aerial vehicles'.



Title: Unidentified Flying Objects

To: Director of Central Intelligence

Author: MArshall H. Chadwell, Assistant Director Scientific Intelligence

Date: December 2, 1952




Cheers.

edit on 3-8-2023 by karl 12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 19 2012 @ 08:34 PM
link   
Pressing all the wrong buttons tonight, my bad. Feel free to delete this post

edit on 19-8-2012 by markymint because: made a mistake



posted on Aug, 19 2012 @ 08:38 PM
link   
Nice articles, and the thread is a good catalyst for further investigation! The footage is nothing short of amazing



Originally posted by FireMoon
www.dailymail.co.uk...


The story in this link caught my eye. I know it's a bit OT, but this seemed an interesting case, what interests me is the intimacy of the sighting, that his colleagues were banking away yet he was treated to the show. Also his quote, that was along the lines of "I've only seen one, but I've seen one" intrigues me. Why do some of us see true-fo's more than once, why do decorated pilots actually in the air only have one sighting? (albeit a spectacular one usually)

Lots of mystery, plenty of intrigue, so S&F for that!

A question: How long is radar data top secret, does it expire and become free information at some point?
edit on 19-8-2012 by markymint because: added a question



posted on Aug, 19 2012 @ 09:09 PM
link   
reply to post by karl 12
 


Thanks for your contribution, Karl. Those are some strongly-worded documents there. One of my all-time favorite lines is from the Air Materiel Command Opinion Concerning "Flying Disks", written in 1947:







posted on Aug, 21 2012 @ 07:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by ypperst


Originally posted by Aliensun
It is utterly amazing how you can sit in front of your computer and debunk the deliberations of top US military officials that had mounds of info at their disposal. Not to mention that they would have every reason to down-play what they already knew to interested but unworthy parties such as the FBI. You have done the debunker's work, using a few words that--evidently sufficient for you--simply negates the whole business from day one right up to the present. But it seems to me to fall a bit short of the facts--oh, but you didn't use any, did you?





Originally posted by Aliensun
It is utterly amazing how you can sit in front of your computer and debunk the deliberations of top US military officials that had mounds of info at their disposal. Not to mention that they would have every reason to down-play what they already knew to interested but unworthy parties such as the FBI. You have done the debunker's work, using a few words that--evidently sufficient for you--simply negates the whole business from day one right up to the present. But it seems to me to fall a bit short of the facts--oh, but you didn't use any, did you?


Roger that,
You have to love the narrow minded, inside the box, one dimensional thinking, of most skeptics, they pull out a possible explanation, and then use it like a blanket to cover every UFO sighing .
They had the head of skeptical magazine(Micheal ?)on Larry King talk about close minded, he would not even entertain the idea of other life traveling here because there is no physical evidence. There is so much more to are reality than science will ever know or understand, other dimensions, black holes, dark energry, etc...


edit on 21-8-2012 by zigoapex because: format

edit on 21-8-2012 by zigoapex because: blank space removal



new topics

    top topics



     
    20
    << 1   >>

    log in

    join