Romney to announce running mate Saturday in Va.

Originally posted by rnaa
Ryan is a brilliant choice for Romney's running mate!

For those that want Obama returned to office by the biggest majority in history, that is.

The GOP's whole midterm election strategy in 2010 was all about how Obama's secret plan was going to destroy Medicare. Now that everybody realizes that the ACA actually strengthens Medicare, the GOP picks a VP candidate whose sole claim to fame is that he has a budget plan that actually explicitly destroys Medicare.

Do they really, honestly, believe that the American voting public is that stupid? Really?

Don't both to answer, its a rhetorical question.

First of all, it is fear based tactics like this that shows you are very uninformed. The way Medicare is right now is not sustainable. It is Obama care that plans to do away with Medicare. Take a moment and review Paul Ryans plan to restructure Medicare..

youtube.com

reply to post by paxnatus


Putting Medicare on vouchers is socialism. If we care about our elderly, we wouldn't let that happen. Poor poor Nana!

reply to post by Djayed


Okay, i tried to find the most elementary explaination of how his Medicare plan would work, and you cannot even follow that.....I give up. Vote for your man Obama and then when they put Nana out to pasture, you may remember you had your chance but blew it. I'm not wasting my time anymore with someone who cannot look at facts.

You want to talk Socialism ideology, Does "Lets spread the wealth around" ring a bell? Just what do you think Obama meant when he said that. Wait, please do not answer, because we all know the only reason I said that is because I am racist and don't want a negro in the Oval office!!

Originally posted by Djayed
reply to post by ownbestenemy

 

First, If you look back at the posts I was attacked first by being told I need an IQ test before I vote. Also, articles on a website does not make the article true, either do videos on YouTube.

I read what was written. It was a bit slight but never a direct attack, but fair enough. While articles on a website do not make anything true neither does your support and/or "evidence". So you created this vast roundabout that no one can win. They can't post evidence and you will never accept it. Do you want them to mail it to you instead so it isn't on a website?

If you are going to make accusations against our president there needs to be proof. No signature or voice recording by Obama or it didn't happen. I am a researcher by trade, don't be sheep. Do your research about daily caller, actually check facts.

Like hell I wont! I will call out my president anytime and with whatever information I have that I deem worthy and reliable; just as the poster has. But you setup this extraordinary bar to be reached that I have a feeling was not set so high a few years ago, considering you think Bush the younger was the worst. Interestingly enough you want readers to believe you over a site that at least has accountability. You? You are an anonymous poster that can cut and run at any time after making claims.

And here is the proof to debunk your so called proof
Debunk the auto emails

You do see the irony in this right? Complaining about Daily Caller and than using Media Matters to counter.....if not than I will respectfully bow out of this vicious circle we will be embroiled in from here on out.

Read this about one of their articles, it speaks to most of the websites so called News.

Let us get this straight right here. I never defended the source. I defended the poster that was participating in my thread. Yet you provide a blog and wikipedia as your "source". Again, careful there is irony in the air tonight...

Originally posted by ownbestenemy
Yet you provide a blog and wikipedia as your "source". Again, careful there is irony in the air tonight...

edit on 13-8-2012 by ownbestenemy because: (no reason given)

Lol, the irony was kinda the point, I would have preferred if the OP would have called it out though.