It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The sound is an explosive pattern; boom, boom, boom, as the building progressively collapses. Each explosion bringing the next part of the tower down in succession.
Originally posted by DeeKlassified
If you do watch this montage, the footage from 24:07 - 24:27 is probably the best I've seen where you can hear explosives detonating on different floors as the tower collapses.
Originally posted by DeeKlassified
I can see some people replying in this thread do not take lots of eye witness acounts seriously, just like NIST and co.
These people seem very sure what they experienced, I don't think they were mistaken. The footage speaks for itself.
I don't understand why some folk are hellbent on ignoring the obvious?
Those that still cannot accpet explosives were used to bring down the buildings, have yet to comment on the section of the video from 24:07 - 24:27. I have mentioned this a couple of times, but no members that wont accept explosions seem to want to pass comment?
24:07 - 24:27 is clear audio and visual evidence of explosives detonating, I don't understand how after seeing that section of the video anyone could still think explosives were not used?
Don't be fooled by the official reports, they were a shambles and designed to hide what really happened. Perhaps that is enough for some people, but there are many people, professionals included that do not accept the government reports.
24:07 - 24:27 anyone?
I can see some people replying in this thread do not take lots of eye witness acounts seriously, just like NIST and co.
ASSERTION #4 “Several credible eyewitnesses are adamant that they heard explosions in or near the towers.”
PROTEC COMMENT: Maybe they did hear loud noises that sounded to them like explosions, but such statements do nothing to refute scientific evidence that explosives were not used.
Arguing over who heard explosion-like noises, when they heard them, how loud they were or from what direction they came is a pointless exercise. This is not to imply that any witness should be ridiculed or dismissed; however, such subjective, highly interpretive statements do nothing to prove or disprove the presence of explosives. Simply put, there are countless causes of sharp, loud noises that have no relation to explosives.
The only scientifically legitimate way to ascertain if explosives were used is to cross- reference the fundamental characteristics of an explosive detonation with independent ground vibration data recorded near Ground Zero on 9/11. Fortunately, several seismographs were recording ground vibration that morning, and perhaps more fortunately, all available data is consistent and paints a clear picture.
Seismographs at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in Palisades, New York, recorded the collapses of WTC 1, 2 and 7. This data was later released to the public and currently appears on their website. Additionally, on 9/11 Protec field technicians were utilizing portable field seismographs to continuously record ground vibrations on several construction sites in Manhattan and Brooklyn for liability purposes.
In all cases, these recordings indicate single vibration events when the buildings collapsed. At no point during 9/11 were independent or secondary vibration events documented by any seismograph, and we are unaware of any entity possessing such data.
This evidence makes a compelling argument against explosive demolition. The laws of physics dictate that any detonation powerful enough to defeat steel columns would have transferred excess energy through those same columns into the ground, and would certainly have been detected by at least one of the monitors that were sensitive enough to record the structural collapses. However, a detailed analysis of all available data reveals no presence of any unusual or abnormal vibration events.
Originally posted by davidmann
reply to post by lunarasparagus
Enjoyed the implosion link. I think building 7 was done better than anything I saw on the tape, wonder what group was hired for the charges? They did swell work. Thanks, very convincing.
Originally posted by lunarasparagus
Originally posted by davidmann
reply to post by lunarasparagus
Enjoyed the implosion link. I think building 7 was done better than anything I saw on the tape, wonder what group was hired for the charges? They did swell work. Thanks, very convincing.
You wonder "what group", but an equally intriguing question would be HOW they detonated steel-cutting explosives without them making a sound and with no seismic fingerprint. That's really what makes their work so "swell".