Question for the avid believers on these forums

reply to post by BagBing


www.abovetopsecret.com...

Just for you

reply to post by TinkerHaus


Photo with the silver orb:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I accidentally caught it whilst photographing a translucent orb being trailed by jets, that was in the ic to but cropped off, if i still have the originals on my laptop, ill re -up load.

Sorry it took so long.

Personally, I don't really need to see any pictures or videos of UFOs to become a "believer" in something or other. Over the years, I've read enough government documents like the Twining memo from 1947 and the Chadwell memo from 1952 to convince me 100% that some of them are real and are coming here from other planets.

I mean, we even have plenty of people from various governments who have come forward and admitted it over the years.

So for me, I don't even argue about that any more, and I don't need any more evidence. I am just waiting for the next shoe to drop here, but that's really in the hands of our "visitors" than the governments. They are really holding all the cards in the final analysis, given that they are so obviously far ahead of us in technology.

reply to post by danaBLAF


It's wrong because it breeds ignorance. Many things in the sky could look like many other things. Until you can prove precisely what the object is, using the run of the mill ATS explanations is stupid. I'm convinced that ATS would never spot a real ET craft. They're too quick to use known excuses with logic to debunk. Corrolation does not equal causality. One of the most common mistakes in science or obervation of data.