A Plea to Conservatives that would trash Liberals

reply to post by totallackey


I have seen some pointless posts in my 27 years, but that one is up there with the best of them.

reply to post by Evolutionsend


Pointless? The point is you have ZERO clue in this case...all you do is seek to lay blame and the best you can do in that case is to place it on another door step.

Did you have the foresight to place the blame in a non-descript brown paper sack, set it on fire, ring the door bell, quickly run away behind some bushes, and then look on in delight to get your jollies? Not in this case...you simply scooped up some puppy poo and flung it to the wall hoping some would stick...and then you do not even have the decency to clean it up...you look to others to do your cleaning...

No...colossal fail...as is any exercise in blaming...

reply to post by totallackey


If a civil war breaks out, blame isn't going to matter much. You seem to enjoy starting wars though. Do you have the balls to fight one?

reply to post by Evolutionsend


So, just to point out your style of logic:

Disagreement and negative characterization of your viewpoint by other persons = Acts of War

Yeah, gotcha chickey...

reply to post by totallackey


It could be defined as a "flame war". I consider it venom or hatred. It's all over ATS.

Like a typical conservative, you simply must spew it. Spewing that venom creates division and hatred on both sides.

That is my point and thank you for proving it...

How can you construe anything I have written as hateful?

Because I disagree with what you written and have pointed out there is no real sense in what you have written, merely a feeble attempt to lay blame at the doorstep of another, I am hateful?

Is it not hateful to label another person as hateful?

reply to post by totallackey


Your opening post was a clear cut insult that added nothing to the discusion other than ridicule.

I would say that's a good basis for labeling you as a hateful person.

reply to post by Evolutionsend


Oh...I see...you take insult when the things you write are identified as senseless...

Well, I have a couple of suggestions:

1. Do not necessarily make the connection between the things you write and think as being who or what you are; for in reality, they are not.
   
2. Try to make more sense when you write something.
   

Originally posted by totallackey
reply to post by Evolutionsend

 

Oh...I see...you take insult when the things you write are identified as senseless...

Well, I have a couple of suggestions:

1. Do not necessarily make the connection between the things you write and think as being who or what you are; for in reality, they are not.
   
2. 2 Try to make more sense when you write something.
   

I could say the same to you. Using a cheap translator?

This thread was supposed to be about a lack of unity, and trying to move past that. Thank you for mucking it up.

reply to post by Evolutionsend


If I ever thought someone who labeled my writing was ridiculing me personally, it would seldom end up well for me. The other person was simply pointing out their inability to make sense out of what was written.

So, let me see if I understand what you have written. I will paraphrase and you can let me know if I have a good understanding of what you are trying to communicate.

Essentially, you are stating:

Originally posted by Evolutionsend
With all of the trashing of liberals recently, it’s no surprise that the liberal gunman hell-bent of revolution would call himself Joker, or BAD guy.

1. The Joker was liberal
   
   

   
   Originally posted by Evolutionsend
   Conservatives that have played right into the trap of a very intelligent young man...A scrawny nerdy madman that you created.

   
   
2. Conservatives are somehow at fault for creating the Joker
   
   

   
   Originally posted by Evolutionsend
   I suggest that not only ATS, but also media outlets take a step back from Occupy and the liberals. The accusations will cause things to come to a breaking point if they continue in the same manner that they have been.

   
   
3. Liberals do not seek to create anything so heinous as the Joker
   

   
   Originally posted by Evolutionsend
   Keep in mind that Occupy for the most part hasn’t attacked any other political groups. I think it’s time to start following the golden rule, “do unto others as you would have them do unto you”. Occupy doesn’t attack and trash every Teaparty thread, don’t do it to them. If I see one more phony picture of a so called Occupy protest. Some of you have linked pictures from Russian protests ffs!

   
   
4. Leave Occupy and other liberals alone, or else...
   

Do I understand what you wrote? If not, could you be so kind as to point where I misunderstand?

Originally posted by Evolutionsend

This thread was supposed to be about a lack of unity, and trying to move past that. Thank you for mucking it up.

edit on 22-7-2012 by Evolutionsend because: (no reason given)

Please point out one message or one sentence within the total message that calls for or otherwise would be or could be construed as a call for unification. Thank you.

reply to post by totallackey




No, the Joker is the BAD guy. Did you not notice how many times I said that? His political orientation has nothing to do with his status as the villian of Batman.

The gunman chose to say he was the joker, so that you would understand that, like Joker, he was the BAD guy.

Not because he was a liberal, but because he was a murderer. Is see this mass shooting as retaliation for something.

At the time I posted the thread he was being linked to "Black Bloc" Occupy, and had left due to a lack of violent action. Many members of "Black Bloc" Occupy have been calling for more violent action, based on the fact that they're already being labeled as violent and bad anyways.

The information about him being linked to Occupy hasn't been in the media, and it probably won't be. I still believe that his actions are based on the sentiment shared by Black Bloc Occupy.

Imo it was a sick and twisted politically motivated attack, to make the statement, "If you accuse me of being the BAD guy, you will see just how bad I can be".

I would also love to know if this guy was an ATS member. That's not going to happen either.

I would also like to see a bit more unity in at least the ATS community. There are other threads calling for this, ATS has sold out, etc.

reply to post by Evolutionsend


Well, I appreciate the explanation...I still see no sense in your explanation of possible motive.

Conservatism did not create this. I can see no benefit (or move toward unity) in assigning blame to a political idealogy.

That is why your post makes no sense to me.

reply to post by totallackey


We can blame the maxists and the socialists, but we can't blame the goldenboy conservatives? Gotcha.

reply to post by Evolutionsend

Blaming leads to unity...gotcha...

Originally posted by Evolutionsend


I suggest that not only ATS, but also media outlets take a step back from Occupy and the liberals. The accusations will cause things to come to a breaking point if they continue in the same manner that they have been.

So you're saying, "Stop criticising us or our policies because we won't hold ourselves accountable for our actions?"

reply to post by Evolutionsend


That is a Joke, liberals crying about vilification. Wasn't it Liberals who spent the last 30 years with there fellow liberal feminist's in demonizing boy's, young men and men? Wasn't it Liberals who systematically used their position in education to discriminate against a generation of young American men?(war on boy's)

I don't know about others, but me, myself and I am not going to support a group of people that have made it consistently known that they hate me because:

a) my gender

and

b) my ethnicity.

Do you honestly think me stupid? Only someone of lesser intelligence who support people who are bigoted against them. Who would you "support", those who are indifferent to you or those who hate you?