It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
For the last two years, the President’s Budget Submissions for the Department of Defense have included purchases of a significant amount of combat equipment, including armored vehicles, helicopters and even artillery, under an obscure section of the FY2008 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for the purposes of “homeland defense missions, domestic emergency responses, and providing military support to civil authorities.”
Items purchased under the section include combat vehicles, tanks, helicopters, artillery, mortar systems, missiles, small arms and communications equipment.
Justifications for the budget items indicate that many of the purchases are part of routine resupply and maintenance, yet in each case the procurement is cited as being “necessary for use by the active and reserve components of the Armed Forces for homeland defense missions, domestic emergency responses, and providing military support to civil authorities” under section 1815 of the FY2008 NDAA.
Originally posted by seabag
Why would the US military need tanks, artillery, missiles etc for domestic use? I’m not sure how any of these items could be used during a “national catastrophe” unless that catastrophe was CIVIL WAR or an attack on our shores (Foreign troops have never invaded the US)!!
edit on 19-7-2012 by seabag because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
I sure hope he has a way to just order himself up an army to man all this equipment. I've yet to talk to a Vet that would have gone against U.S. Civilians but I've talked to plenty who would have walked from their units our turned the weapons around on the Officer who ordered them to commit murder.
All the scenarios presume there are trained soldiers who can just forget... these are their own people and could be their own families. I still don't see this happening until or unless they come up with a way to bring foreign troops in. A few squads of Polish in Illinois or a Platoon of Italians in Ohio don't count for anything. It'd take hundreds of thousands. Millions.....long term. Where?
Originally posted by bobs_uruncle
Originally posted by seabag
Why would the US military need tanks, artillery, missiles etc for domestic use? I’m not sure how any of these items could be used during a “national catastrophe” unless that catastrophe was CIVIL WAR or an attack on our shores (Foreign troops have never invaded the US)!!
edit on 19-7-2012 by seabag because: (no reason given)
I hate to confuse reality with fiction, but Canada (a colony) invaded the US in the war of 1812.
Cheers - Daveedit on 7/19.2012 by bobs_uruncle because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by g146541
Ok, then explain NDAA and the sudden need for domestic military assets. There has been no serious terrorism in US in 11 years.edit on 19-7-2012 by seabag because: (no reason given)
IAW Section 1815 of the FY08 NDAA this item is necessary for use by the active components and reserve components of the Armed Forces for homeland defense missions, domestic emergency responses, and providing military support to civil authorities.
Originally posted by seabag
Originally posted by bobs_uruncle
Originally posted by seabag
Why would the US military need tanks, artillery, missiles etc for domestic use? I’m not sure how any of these items could be used during a “national catastrophe” unless that catastrophe was CIVIL WAR or an attack on our shores (Foreign troops have never invaded the US)!!
edit on 19-7-2012 by seabag because: (no reason given)
I hate to confuse reality with fiction, but Canada (a colony) invaded the US in the war of 1812.
Cheers - Daveedit on 7/19.2012 by bobs_uruncle because: (no reason given)
Right!
200 years ago on horse back!
I didn't realize I had to be so precise in my wording. I stand corrected.
I should have said “Foreign troops have never successfully invaded the US”.
Normally I hate getting drawn into these thread, but this is absolutely true. If you go to the Army's budget requests for this year:
Originally posted by bobs_uruncle
I hate to confuse reality with fiction, but Canada (a colony) invaded the US in the war of 1812.
Originally posted by VforVendettea
Originally posted by bobs_uruncle
I hate to confuse reality with fiction, but Canada (a colony) invaded the US in the war of 1812.
Yes, But they burned the white house.
Today I'd hand them the torch to do it all over again, Congress too.