It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by johnthejedi24
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by mbkennel
There is a one word reply that will answer all your questions and the ONLY REASON I am allowed to say this word is the fact that it has already appeared in one form or another in various Media Speculation...thus I am not breaking anything open as even if it exists...it has been talked about so I am not the First...by any means...to bring it up or theorize about it.
It is a SMALL word that has implications of a level that I do not believe I can find the proper word to describe it as nothing I can think of will do as HUGE or MASSIVE do not do the Implications of this SINGLE WORD the proper JUSTICE of describing the degree of it's implications.
The word is......DEAL.
Split Infinity
What do the Earth Governments have to deal or negotiate with advanced extraterrestrial entities? It would be like a human negotiating property rights with an ant colony.....what's the point and why wouldn't the ETs just do what they want?
reply to post by JediMindTrek
Tony Blair really be the one to start the trend in actually letting the people of the most sovereign nations really know what's going on with anything and everything that has to do with unidentified flying objects?
reply to post by SplitInfinity
It has to do with what the U.S. Military will go through and to what lengths it will travel not to allow something to be left behind.
Originally posted by Morg234
reply to post by SplitInfinity
It has to do with what the U.S. Military will go through and to what lengths it will travel not to allow something to be left behind.
Does it mention anything about dumping its poor dead pawns in landfill?edit on 21/7/12 by Morg234 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
I am not one to think of something such as capital letters as an indication of someone screaming or shouting but rather a visual association with a word or phrases importance to the subject at hand. Still...I can see how it can be perceived as one person attempting to overpower another's statement by using themSplit Infinity