The 7/7 London Bombings Brilliantly Exposed as an Inside Job

Originally posted by AndyMayhew

Originally posted by ZeroRisk
Educate yourself. It wasn't JUST a desk exercise.

Yes it was. How many such exercises have you been involved with?

But I guess when facts don't fit the conspiracy it's easiest to deny the facts.

Wow. Didn't even bother to click the link.

How could it have been a desk exercise when there was a mock report created? how could it be a desk exercise when people were drafted in to act out various aspects of the drill. There are pictures of a the bleeding drill where people are practicing mock terror relief. Probably another paid shill.

reply to post by AndyMayhew


This statement does not take the British nature in to account. We will not ever bow down to terrorists or hostiles. Bluwing us up will not make us go running with our tail between our legs, as your statement seems to imply.

It didn't work for the IRA, so why the hell would you think it'd work for the alleged Al-Quieda terrorists?

Given the British nature towards acts of terrorism, us going into Afghanistan, rightfully or wrongfully, was most certainly the only envisible result.

If the bombings were designed by al-Quieda to frighten us, they failed to take our nature into account.

If the bombings were a false-flag designed to "get us on-side" then whoever did it not only has no concience, but also understood the British psyche very well.

Originally posted by AndyMayhew

Originally posted by ZeroRisk
Educate yourself. It wasn't JUST a desk exercise.

Yes it was. How many such exercises have you been involved with?

But I guess when facts don't fit the conspiracy it's easiest to deny the facts.

I only see one person denying the facts here, and that's you.

Peter Power admitted only hours after this happened that their "drill" involved the same scenario, on the same day, at the same locations, at the same time.

I would really suggest that you look into mathematical probability. The chances of any of those aspects being the same coincidentally is so unlikely it's ridiculous. The idea that Peter Power and his "client" managed to create a drill that effectively duplicated a series of genuine terrorist attacks in the same locations, on the same day, at the same time is insane!

If you are not capable of even conceding that this mathematical probability problem exists there is absolutely no point in debating this with you.

You're in denial. You're refusing logic in order to avoid asking yourself some reasonable questions.

reply to post by detachedindividual


Hardly the same time given that he was prevented from getting to the office due to the bombs

But I guess you know more than he does. And if he doesn't say what you want to believe he was obviously lying

Originally posted by AndyMayhew
reply to post by detachedindividual

 

Hardly the same time given that he was prevented from getting to the office due to the bombs

But I guess you know more than he does. And if he doesn't say what you want to believe he was obviously lying

Peter Power HIMSELF said he was running a drill at the same time and location, with the exact same scenario of simultaneous bombs going off, he said so himself, and you deny that he made those statements?
Folks, this is the madness of it all, I'm afraid.

Note also that it wasn't until 9th July 2005, two days after the incidents, that it was revealed the explosions on the underground were 'almost simultaneous'. Power's fictional scenario, as explained by the man himself on the day, bears a closer resemblance to the eventual story of 7/7 than it does to the actual story that had been presented to the public by the police and authorities at the time of his interview.

Website has all the info

And about your disinformation claim that Peter Powers drill was JUST desk exercise...Erm, nope.



There is an image of the 7/7 terror drill run before the actual bombings. Notice there's no dust, ash or soot on the faces of the "wounded". Likewise, notice the TFL staff calmly standing around. Lastly, notice the woman in the top right of the image chatting away and smiling with the man. Not really the type of atmosphere after a terror attack is it?

Power: It's a coincidence, and it's a spooky coincidence. Our scenario was very similar - it wasn't totally identical, but it was based on bombs going off, to the time, the locations...

www.julyseventh.co.uk...

Excuse me, but what are the chances that a terror attack which is practically IDENTICAL to the terror drill, takes place in the exact SAME locations and at the SAME time as the terror drill?

Now what are the chances that this will also occur on 9/11? NORAD "hijack" drills [Vigilant Guardian], CIA NRO "plane crash" drill, Pentagon drills etc. FAA and NORAD radar crew admit to combating multiple phantom hijackings on the morning of 9/11 due to all these hijack drills.

Lastly, tell me, what then are the chances that this will also occur on 22/7 Norway shootings. Research Utøya drill. Police conducted a drill exercise of a lone gunman taking down civilians and police, just hours before it happened. 26 minutes after the anti-terror bomb drill in the capital, the car bomb goes off. Or is that just a coincidence too?

Only hours before Anders Breivik Behring began firing at the youths Utøya, police emergency squad completed an exercise where they practiced an almost identical situation

Utøya Drill

So, 9/11, 7/7 and 22/7 - what do they have in common? on ALL THREE occasions, there were anti-terror drills either DURING or just BEFORE, a terror attack - which guess what, is the EXACT same scenario as the terror drill...and we're supposed to believe this is all just coincidence.

With such odds, you'd be more likely to win the Euro-millions lottery 20,000,000 times or more...

What are the chances that a firm that specialises in helping other firms deal with the effects of a terrorist attack would anticipate the most likely targets for such an attack and often use similar locations to those of that actual attacks in their regular training sessions? And than admit so live on TV immediately after the attacks?

Of course, it's always possible that someone involved in the attacks was aware of these training sessions and noted that Peter Power had already picked the best targets for them?

Anyway, what Mr Powers actually had to say:

truth11.com...

Make you own minds up.

Operation Northwoods shows some higher powers think very differently to the average man in the street.

From 1945 to 1990, NATO nation's partook in thousands of Soviet invasion war planning exercises. None what so ever came to be real on those very days, at those very locations with those very planned outcomes. None.

From 1945 to 1990 NORAD launched thousands of rapid nuclear strike exercises scrambling millions of man hours worth of effort in exercises. As above, none ever came real. None.

From 1969 to 1990, UK government conducted exercises to cope and prepare for massed casualties from IRA terror bombings. As above, none ever came true.

Now from my own personal experience of exercises where a Gold Commander oversaw a major incident exercise, none what so ever came true at the time, location and in the nature of said exercise.
Fastforward to the days of Bush and Blaire , suddenly the exercise planners are prophetic mystics.

Yeah, pull the other one, it's got 'Saddam has weapons of mass destruction' written on it.

If you hold a fire drill every day, then sooner or later a fire will coincide with the drill

Though of course this fire drill comprised just 6 people sitting around a desk answering questions about how, for example, they would complete an important contract if key staff couldn't get to work because of a serious of terrorist attacks. The elephant in the room.

Here is another view of the bombings on 7/7. The documentary is very well made and definately worth the viewing

What private company would have any need to run an exercise encompassing security in the public transport system?

Bumping for some old time conspiracy www.youtube.com...