It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by macman
reply to post by Mart0
Or it's ok since others will carry more of the burden?
Originally posted by dalek
UK chap here.
I would like to congratulate the Supreme Court for actually ruling correctly.
Originally posted by Mart0
reply to post by macman
Well you sure did miss the other 2 paragraphs of that post, didn't you?
Most clearly aren't denied (Basic) medical services. If I really must spell it out for you then okay:
The poor now have a chance not to be absolutely obliterated by debt if they end up getting something like a serious Auto-Immune disease or Cancer.
Congratulations! Your Cancer has finally been cleared, Now ...About that 90 grand
Originally posted by Mart0
Yes, Yes it is ok that a collective society collect the burden of the poor and helpless. That's what being in a progressive (I'm sure you'll associate that word with Liberals) and advancing society in the 21st century.
Originally posted by underduck
I think some of you guys are missing the point. This is a HUGE human rights victory. Giving everyone right to health care is far more important than any petty squabbles we have with the current or past administrations.
Originally posted by jrod
reply to post by AntiNWO
That is what I am afraid of. This could leave many Americans myself included with a tax penalty that we cannot afford. Then what?
Originally posted by haarvik
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
And just what the frick do you call it??
It is socialized medicine, just under cover of another name.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Only people who decide not to be responsible and buy health insurance will pay the tax...not every single person
Originally posted by dalek
UK chap here.
I would like to congratulate the Supreme Court for actually ruling correctly.
I could never understand why Prisoners were afforded better medial care than an honest citizen.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Originally posted by haarvik
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
And just what the frick do you call it??
It is socialized medicine, just under cover of another name.
I would love socialized medicine.
What if you have no income? And don't want to have health insurance?
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by dalek
UK chap here.
I would like to congratulate the Supreme Court for actually ruling correctly.
I could never understand why Prisoners were afforded better medial care than an honest citizen.
Um, they are not. Ever been inside a Prison here?
So, you applaud us going down the path to Europe? Might as well just kick me in the nutts as well.
Originally posted by Mart0
Yes, Yes it is ok that a collective society collect the burden of the poor and helpless.
Originally posted by Mart0
That's what being in a progressive (I'm sure you'll associate that word with Liberals) and advancing society in the 21st century.