It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A political website that contained stinging criticism of the Obama administration and its handling of the Fast and Furious scandal was ordered to be shut down by the Obama campaign’s ‘Truth Team’, according to private investigator Douglas Hagmann, who was told by ISP GoDaddy his site contained information that was “maliciously harmful to individuals in the government.”
Dear Sir or Madam,
Our records indicate that you are responsible for the HOMELANDSECURITYUS.COM domain name and its hosted content. We have received complaints about your domain name and the contents of your website. Upon reviewing the situation, we have found that they are in violation on section 7 of your Domain Registration Agreement. (www.godaddy.com...) We understand that this can be a very sensitive topic, and that there will likely be a difference of opinion as to the nature of the complaints. We are not making a determination in favor of either, but do not wish to be involved in such disputes. As a result, we ask that you move the registration and hosting for these sites to another provider (Not affiliated with GoDaddy.com or our Reseller division, WildWestDomains.com). If you can initiate this move within 48 hours of the transmission of this notice, there will not need to be any downtime for your site. If the transfer is not initiated by this time, we may have to suspend services to your website. We strongly recommend you reply to this message as to your intentions.
This will further help insure that no unnecessary downtime results for your site.
If you have any questions, please let us know.
Please be aware that this decision is final, and we do not wish to debate the actual content of your site.
Regards,
Network Abuse Department
GoDaddy.com
24/7 Network Abuse Department
Hotline: 480-624-2505
The first words from “Rosebud’s” mouth were various expletives strung together in an interestingly creative tirade. Based on the uncharacteristically profane welcome that I thought was directed at me, it was quite obvious that my source was very angry.
“Do you know that the ‘[expletive deleted]-storm’ is still going on because of all the attention to your article?” Thinking that the “bloom was off the rose” and I was about to lose a valuable source, I began to remind my source that we agreed on what could be printed and spoken publicly, and he seemed to have previously come to terms with the initial blow-back created after the initial information he had given me made the rounds. My explanation was interrupted by his sudden laughter, a welcome relief from the tension I initially felt.
“Don’t worry my friend, it’s all good. I just didn’t think the information would have such staying power. We did the right thing by getting this stuff out there, and I’m convinced of that,” he stated. “We hit a nerve, and a big one,” he added, allowing me to relax a bit and feel better about his use of the words ‘we’ and ‘our.’
“I should have told you this before. Having the information first published in Canada was brilliant. It added a layer of inconvenience beyond their [DHS] containment and control, and they [Canada Free Press] did a great job with exposure. Make sure you tell them that. But the pressure is still on to find out where the leaks are coming from, so we’ve got to change a few operational things. But you’ve got to keep getting the word out while I take care of some things on my end,” my source instructed.
The first order of business was to establish a different communications protocol, followed by some information my source wanted to make certain I had correctly or to reemphasize. “We’re going to hit some more and even bigger nerves in due time, so just be ready” he added. Ready for what, I wondered.
Originally posted by Hugues de Payens
If this proves true.....
Someone please explain under what legal authority Obama's CAMPAIGN has in ordering a domain service to shut down one its websites?
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Originally posted by Hugues de Payens
If this proves true.....
Someone please explain under what legal authority Obama's CAMPAIGN has in ordering a domain service to shut down one its websites?
Who says they did???
Oh right...the OP did in the thread title...with nothing else to back it up...just his random opinion.
I repeated my initial questions, and although he refused to provide any specific details, eventually gave me some clues without breaking ranks from his company policies on not telling their customers anything. The clues pointed to Obama’s “truth teams.”
Originally posted by hackin
They say they are not taking any sides in regards to the complaint but clearly they are if they're obeying the request of the Obama team.
Their customers' rights are those that those customers agreed to in the Terms of Service Agreement. Break those and GoDaddy has every right to terminate their contract with you.
Shame on GoDaddy. They are spineless and cowardly. They don't care about their customers rights...
I am going in search of a host defends privacy and freedoms, a host that doesn't communicate with censorship requests.
Originally posted by Hugues de Payens
If this proves true.....
Someone please explain under what legal authority Obama's CAMPAIGN has in ordering a domain service to shut down one its websites?
Under what authority does ANYONE in the government have the power to order any PRIVATE business to shut down without due process?edit on 26-6-2012 by Hugues de Payens because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Lazyninja
And an edit here for the post above mine: Godaddy has no clue whether what this guy is doing is legal or not, or against their T&C or not and doesn't care, all they care about is keeping their nose clean.