It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Physic
what about misleading her majesty,
would that not be the death penalty
but the Queen, i think not, she has to have been made aware of the full deal
Originally posted by spoor
Originally posted by michael1983l
there was no UN mandate to go to war
What makes you think there has to be a UN mandate?
Originally posted by Physic
reply to post by TrueBrit
I'd think it is designed to protect the Queen and Tony Blair either lied to Queen knowlingly and deliberatly or told her the truth and she may have issued a warning, of precaution, as it does endanger her, as some may not feel she is protected by the illusion of no power and authority and other obviously know that Blair if he lied, should been handed death sentence and if he told her the truth, then she was an accomplice to the acts and deserves punishment, however you can't punish the Queen, cause she has immunity, and Blair the same...unless they are extradited or caught outside of the quarters..
Would this be death penalty for lying to her Majesty or more immunity for him, as in the form of pardon, as got to admit, it has been paying off handsomely...so don't hear the Queen complaining about it, or anything for that matter, only suggesting she agreed to it and so did all the rest and are letting Blair slide, same as in the US with Bush and cronies getting away with murder also...
I support Billy Jack Justice and like to see him whip all their arses...
edit on 23-6-2012 by Physic because: getting this thread confused with the "Queen is a bloated Parasite" thread