People sometimes need to be pigeon holed ! lol ! maybe a democrat , republican , conservative , right wing ,left wing, extremist , socialist ,
conspiracy theorist .....
I think being a father and generally loving life and the human race I’ll be a "Humanist".
Seeing an article like this only strengthens my belief in standing against these bullies , my message to the NWO is you will not win we are stronger
, you will not reincarnate into paradise ,our army will soon rally together to meet you face to face , Look what you do to the miracle of life , be
ashamed ....
Outrage as China 'forces seven month pregnant woman to have abortion for breaching one-child policy'
Grisly photos of a young woman lying beside her baby which had been aborted by force in her seventh month of pregnancy have caused outrage in
China.
Pictures purporting to show the woman and her blood-covered baby have shocked anti-abortion groups in China - and fury is spreading around the
world.
The mother, Feng Jianmei, told local media that she was forceably injected with a chemical to induce an abortion and her child was stillborn 36 hours
later.
Because she already had a child, said Feng, local birth-control authorities ordered her to pay a fine of £4,000.
She didn't have the money, she said, so a team from the local family planning authority in Shannxi province came to collect her from her home and take
her to hospital for the forced abortion.
Recounting the horror, Feng said she told the family planning department she could not pay the fine because her mother-in-law needed money for cancer
treatmen
It was then, she claimed, the authorities began their action against her.
She said no less than 20 staff from the family planning department came to her home and placed her under arrest.
As they drove her to the hospital for a forced abortion, she began to resist - resulting in her being beaten.
At the hospital she was restrained and given an injection that would be lethal to the foetus. None of her family was allowed to be present during the
traumatic time, she said.
Feng said that her father-in-law heard about her being taken away but when he rushed to the hospital he was prevented from entering the obstetrics
ward.
'IT SANCTIONS VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN'
As outrage spread of the incident, Chai Ling of the U.S.-based activist group All Girls Allowed said Feng's story demonstrated how the One-Child
Policy continued to sanction violence against women every day.
The group said it had spoken to Feng and her husband Deng Jiyuan after the incident, when Mr Deng claimed his wife had been forcibly taken to hospital
and restrained before she was given the injection.
Within China there has been growing outrage on social media sites.
One writer commented: 'This is what they say the Japanese devils and Nazis did.
'But it's happening in reality and it is by no means the only case.' The writer added: 'They (the officials) should be executed.
As outrage spread around anti-abortion groups in China, the authorities strenuously denied Feng's version of the events.
Li Yuongjou, deputy chief of Ankang's family department, said the reality was that 'Feng was not forced to abort'.
He said: 'A lot of us tried for days to educate her. She agreed to the abortion herself.'
He added that in China an abortion is allowed up to 28 weeks, saying: 'It's not illegal to conduct "medium term" induction of labour.'
And he admitted, however, that in his town the local target of enforcing the one-child policy had not been achieved for two consecutive years and the
authorities were acting more strenuously to see that the target covering 95 per cent of the population was reached.
Local media said it was most likely that Feng had been injected with a chemical commonly known as Lifannuo - a powerful bactericide used in the late
1980s and early 1990s when China's one-child policy was strongly pursued by authorities.
It is not known how Feng managed to obtain photos of herself beside the aborted child, but anti-abortion groups said they were convinced the pictures
were genuine.
Read more:
www.dailymail.co.uk...[edit
by]edit on 14-6-2012 by thenthinkagain because: (no reason given)