Article: Why we must oppose Obamney for President in 2012

There is a dangerous person running for President in 2012, and his name is Baritt Obamney. I normally try not to attack specific candidates for political office, but Baritt Obamney is so offensive to American sensibilities that I had to share this warning with my fellow Americans.

.....

Whatever the case, it's certain that Obamney isn't a member of the Libertarian party, nor even the Green party, nor any party that advocates government serving the People rather than ruling over them.

Come to think of it, I think Obamney may be a member of the worst political party of all... the most destructive, corrupt, demented, suffocating and stupifying party that has ever come into existence: The Republicrats.

Full article here

Too bad Obamney is our only choice.
As if RP even has a chance.

There has never been a better time for a third party to emerge. The failure of Ron Paul will create a political vacum. Its not too late.Jerry White would be better than Romney or Obama. So would Gary Johnson. There are options on americanselect.com. It is not too late at all.

edit- Europe are turning away from major parties. They have to ignore MSM to do it. So do you.

Typical pap from natural news. Being 'against' is an easy and simplistic statement. The author offers no constructive solutions, nor is he willing to put forth support for any specific candidates or platforms, either at the local state or federal levels.

I've wondered how the name mash up would work. I've had Rombama in my head.

Originally posted by GmoS719
Too bad Obamney is our only choice.
As if RP even has a chance.

Well, me personally, I am against Ron Paul also. But even if he's doesn't have a chance, he's still a choice. For those who do vote, picking Obama or Romney just because they are "the only choice" which isn't true isn't a very good idea, IMHO.

Originally posted by stanguilles7
Typical pap from natural news. Being 'against' is an easy and simplistic statement. The author offers no constructive solutions, nor is he willing to put forth support for any specific candidates or platforms, either at the local state or federal levels.

Well, Stang, to be fair, the article does mention the Libertarian and Green parties because they "advocate [the] Government serving the people."

Plus, I think the article holds back from endorsing any one party, politician or platform because they probably have a wide variety of readers. I think they are trying to appeal to people on the Right and Left who would vote for Romney or Obama, respectively.

So they are saying don't vote for either one of them because they are essentially the same. Instead vote for the Third Party that best aligns with your viewpoint whether it be Libertarian, Green, Socialist, etc.

Also, the article does point out A LOT of platform issues regarding where Obama and Romney are similar in policy. So clearly the article is taking the OPPOSITE stance regarding those platform issues.

Clearly, you have something against Natural News, or possibly against people who are either anti-Romney or anti-Obama, depending upon your side of the political spectrum. If so, give the article a chance and read it thoroughly before reacting. Or if I am wrong in my assessment then I apologize and just ignore what I just said :-)

Shalom.