IA, MT, NJ, SD, NM, CA Primary Thread:

All Polls are now closed EST in NJ: Polls closed at 8 PM.

IA, SD, MT, and NM still have another hour

CA still has another 2+ hrs.

www.google.com...

www.thegreenpapers.com...

To keep updated on the primary numbers please check those two links. I will try to keep updated as the night goes on but its tough to do now, since not even most of the MSM or apparently the voters, care much about these last primaries. I went to my local district today to vote the man in charge said, that three people was considered busy!

www.nbc40.net...

A cool thing tho for anybody in NJ or who is following the NJ senate race. Senator Joe Kyrillos went to vote in a nearby town which is five miles away from where I live.

Romney is already the projected winner in NJ.

Called with only 2% of the vote in...means the election wasn't even close.

www.cnn.com...

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Romney is already the projected winner in NJ.

Called with only 2% of the vote in...means the election wasn't even close.

www.cnn.com...

edit on 5-6-2012 by OutKast Searcher because: (no reason given)

Wow that was fast! To all the naysayers... Are projections ever wrong?

Methinks only in the case of Rick Santorum and Iowa!

On a local level in politics I am now a part of two campaigns. One for Mayor and one for Senator in NJ. I hope to have a pretty eventful summer up until November anyway.

If there is anybody locally located in any of these states please keep track of the counties if you want to. I will do the same for my state.

As of this moment. Ocean County goes to Mitt Romney. He's got 86% of the vote there. It's the county right next to mine!

Originally posted by jjf3rd77


Wow that was fast! To all the naysayers... Are projections ever wrong?

I'm not sure... maybe we should go ask Al Gore how accurate projections are

Originally posted by MrWendal

I'm not sure... maybe we should go ask Al Gore how accurate projections are

Haha good one! Except that I meant here in the elections. They've never really been completely wrong.

You can't make projections with 2% of the data in. It is indication that it is rigged.

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
You can't make projections with 2% of the data in. It is indication that it is rigged.

Sure you can, and if you are right you can have bragging rights! There is no conspiracy, no Paul voters are in NJ. Barely any republicans showed up.

Polls are now closed in: SD, MT, and NM.

Not completely sure what's going on with Iowa today, since didn't they already have their popular vote?

Romney is expected to get all the delegates from NJ since Ron Paul cannot even get over 20% of the vote in any county! Romney is virtually running unopposed. My county goes to Romney! And with the MSM I am projecting the rest of the state does as well!

Update: In NJ 50 delegates are bound to the presidential contender receiving the greatest number of votes in the primary statewide.

www.thegreenpapers.com...

reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL


My thoughts exactly, they call it so people will not pay any attention, and assume Romney wins.

Just came back from the polls in Iowa. The only things being voted on in my precinct are county sheriff, county auditor and representative. All are unchallenged.

Nothing to vote on, really, but I was there.

edit:This was just to select party candidates. You got a ballot for whichever party you declare.

Originally posted by kat2684
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL

 

My thoughts exactly, they call it so people will not pay any attention, and assume Romney wins.

edit on 5-6-2012 by kat2684 because: typo

Republican 101

Originally posted by Beanskinner

Originally posted by kat2684
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL

 

My thoughts exactly, they call it so people will not pay any attention, and assume Romney wins.

edit on 5-6-2012 by kat2684 because: typo

Republican 101

Democrat 101

Romney Projected Winner by huge margins in NJ, NM and SD.

Looks like Romney will be sweeping today...in case anyone had any doubts that he wouldn't.

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
You can't make projections with 2% of the data in. It is indication that it is rigged.

They realize this, they've just been getting so desperate lately that they actually feel the need to make these threads before the elections even take place so that they can "remind" us "Paulites" that their candidate is the republican nominee. *Winkwinknudgenudge*

I knew Romney would win and I still voted for who I think is the best candidate.

That's okay. I just wonder what they'll do when they finally figure out a lot of the Romney delegates are Paul delegates in disguise?

Yes, we were taught how to play the game here in Joisey too!

reply to post by jjf3rd77


Well there's at least one Paul voter in Jersey, not that my vote mattered much.

All polls now closed in the USA.

Awaiting California results