Long time since I contributed here but since school is out for the summer, and I finally turned in my essay for this semester, the source of
inspiration is sprouting in me once again!
As I lay in bed this morning, I got the urge to write these statements.
Hold on to your knickers kids, cause we're gonna bust some sandcastles!
Conspiracies that doesn't add up and why
THE "NWO"
OK, I guess you people are afraid of what is happening in the world, that is truly a normal reaction. I am the first one to admit myself that the
globalization of world politics makes me very uneasy.
But, for the sake of all that is holy, can we treat our fears with some proper
rationality?
The now imfamous term "(the) New World Order" (NWO) is most commonly referred to as being presented by George Bush Sr. in 1991 in a speech he held
to congress. What he meant was a new order that would make the world a more just place for everyone (according to liberal/democratic/western
values).
Of course that specific speech was loaded with a discourse of power, but so is every single statement from a US president. Justice isn't what he
sought but a "new world" that was ridden of the Soviet Union and in which the US had total hegemony. That is also pretty much what happened.
The term NWO go such a massive attention, I guess, because of the specific combination of words, a cultural/linguistic causality.
Actually, NWO in latin is
not "Novus Ordo Seclorum" (which means "A New Order of the Ages") but "Novus Ordo Mundi" so that whole
NWO/USD-connection doens't make sense.
And why it doens't add up:
Look at the EU. Does it look like easy-street to make all these governments stick together? Does it? Does it seem like all the "sheeple voters" are
going to play along?
Does it really now?
No, it does not.
How the hell do you think the
entire world could ever be one single source of politics when we can't even make Europe have a sigle aim, goal
or policy?
It just won't happen!
Does it look like the UN is having an easy time making things happen on a "NWO-level"? Not really, no.
The real NWO is
capitalism and there is no "evil boss" at the top more than ourselves. Capitalism doens't have its headquaters in some
super-secret, deep undergound, apocalypse-proof bunker complex, or in some ancient black castle on a hilltop with constant lightning strikes.
Still, what people are really afraid of is capitalism and they misguide their fears and blame it on the NWO- their very own boogieman that
represents all that is frightening and unknown out there in the dark.
So get this straight one last time people:
NWO is not the enemy since it doesn't even freaking exist (in the way you think it does)- the
capitalist structure is the real enemy! And not the enemy because
I say so but because what I see in peoples visions of the NWO I see only
capitalism. And in that sense of NWO, you are right.
FLOURIDE IN DRINKING WATER
Floruide is good for our teeth. It is true. Shark's teeth are made of mostly flouride and their teeth are super sharp.
Flouride is also very bad for maritime lifeforms, such as microoganisms and bacteria. That is why we like to use it in our fresh water bassins,
because it desinfects. Still, it is very bad to flush that stuff into the lakes and oceans. It can have a very severe effect on the ecosystems- in the
long run. The actual ammount for flouride in mouthwash, toothpaste and (specifically) drinkinwater is extremely small (I know local regualtions may
differ).
To state that "the gummin't" (the government) adds flouride in the drinking water to make us stupid, lazy or whathaveyou, is just too far out.
If they wanted us to be "dumbened down" why the hell wouldn't they use something that
actually works like benzoidiapines?
Why, oh why, would they use flouride?
Stop blaming your own uneducated ignorance on some vague notion that someone for some reason is adding something in your water to make your brain
lame. You do that perfectly well yourself.
You know, they add all kinds of stuff in our drinking waters, chloride for example. I don't know it's always good for us but in general, the society
and its rulers are more happy with a healthy, educated workforce that can pay taxes and make the nation rich and powerful rather than have a herd of
idiots that rot from the inside.
Think about it- does it really add up?
CHEMTRAIL
OK, same as with the flouride:
why?
And why is it always the most "alert" and "sceptical" citizens that warns us of these chemtrails? Aren't you the guys who stand below the
contaminations? Aren't you supposed to be affected? Are you?
Have you any idea on how the wind moves on those altitudes? Have you any idea on how freaking unpredicable the yield is if you spray anything that
high up- especially something that is as thin as mist?
Are these sprayings in any way "selective" on whom it effects? What ensures the members of the so called PTB (Powers That Be) that they won't be
inhaling that stuff?
It doesn't add up.
Spraying of chemicals is done on
low altitude, like when you spray pesticides on a corn field. The military did try to deliver '___' as an
aerosol during the 50's but they quit experimenting with that since
it wasn't an effective measure of delivery.
Just drop it.
REPTILLIANS
This is maybe the lowest form of a conspiracy theory of all times.
Give me
one lead to the validity of this conspiracy that predates 1983, just one.
Why 1983? Well, it was the year that the popular TV-series "V" got presented for the credulous and gullible consuming masses.
I have asked this before to the appropriate audience but I never got an answer. I am, however, beginning to think that the whole reptillian-deal is
one major practical joke played upon the conspiracy-theorist crowd.
CONSPIRACY THEORISTS
Hitler was a conspiracy theorist of high ranks.
He didn't speak of NWO or Reptillians. Instead he spoke of Jews. He wanted them all dead and he did what he could to recruit as many people as
possible to join his side. And people did.
Ronald Reagan was a conspiracy theorist. He thought that the political situation in Central America was threatening the so called "free world". He
made the voters believe that it was okay to launch major-scale terrorism campaigns onto the civillian populations of Nicaragua. They got raped,
tortured and executed because of his feeble beliefs of conspiracies against the US. Same goes with Guatemala, Chile, Iraq, maybe even Iran.
Today we have Icke, Jones and the rest of the crowd.
Of course, they are nowhere
near the levels of influence that Hitler or any US President had or has, but still they have a lot of followers.
What if Icke one day changed his message into:
"people of a certain race/origin/culture are the evil reptillians, they must be fought with all
measures possible!!!" Or what if Alex Jones suddenly started to promote armed resistance on a major scale? Don't you think at least some pople
would?
These guys aren't only uneducated, ignorant, arrogant and silly, they are also potentially dangerous.
CONSPIRACIES THAT
DOES ADD UP
It's not like there aren't any. MKULTRA is a prime example. We are getting side-tracked in our quest for the truth and that side-tracking is done by
our own worst enemy: ourselves.
But
of course we all have the right to free expression. I just used mine