You Are Here, Where Are They..? (Quotes Inside)

reply to post by de1111codEiT


Dude, I appreciate you posting these so much. This is the quality I like to see on the Aliens & UFOs forum.

Thanks for the post I bookmarked it to my evidence folder. That is some pretty credible testimony compiled there and plus the other countless pilots that see these things all the time.

It's almost like disclosure happened but people can't seem to look up from their iphones to notice.

reply to post by de1111codEiT


Could you please provide a link for each quotation so we can verify what each person said and what context it was said in? Otherwise, for all we know, you are just making this stuff up. (It's also in the ATS T&C.)

reply to post by DJW001


Hi DJW001,

Thanks for the bump, I have provided links to ALL of the quotes at the bottom of my forth post in links titled.... 'Source' ...

Exactly what other context do you possibly think these statements could have been made in; the quotes themselves are quite specific to the subject matter.

Why is it that you fail or ignore to see this…?

reply to post by de1111codEiT

Thanks for the bump, I have provided links to ALL of the quotes at the bottom of my forth post in links titled.... 'Source' ...

Exactly what other context do you possibly think these statements could have been made in; the quotes themselves are quite specific to the subject matter.

Why is it that you fail or ignore to see this…?

None of your sources provides any source of their own. Many of these quotations are well known to be fabrications. The Neil Armstrong story, for example. No-one has ever been able to provide the identity of the scientist who allegedly told the anecdote, or even been able to identify the symposium the incident allegedly occurred at.

What's more, your sources are rather indiscriminate when it comes to what they include. For example, one mentions Hillary Clinton comparing the right wing media's obsession with Whitewater to people who are obsessed with UFOs. This doesn't sound like she believes UFOs are extraterrestrial in origin.

The question is, why is it that you fail or ignore to see this?

It is my turn to bump this valid thread - congrats to the OP. We are here, because we believe we are. Maybe we're not if the film The Matrix is any reference. Yet if we are here we can also note that "they" are also here. So many eyewitnesses of high credentials and professional and military qualification make this fact undeniable.


Of course there are those who before authorizing their neurons to twinkle will require to know the source of the source of the source of the source of the source of the source of the source of the source... unless they were given to believe something in the first place, in which case no further examination of data or sources is required.


Keep up the good work !


Getsmart

reply to post by Getsmart


Thank you Getsmart, your bump is wholly appreciated, after sharing over 50 different quotes from several different sources ATS deemed it was not within their T&C to consolidate such quotes on several pages and accused me of posting work written by others. All of the quotes were in Ex quote boxes and were clearly quotes as even quotation marks were used inside the quotation boxes. Also acknowledgement/recognition was given to each individual quote.

Regardless, what ATS did was prompt me into consolidating all of the different quotes from various sources onto one website/page so that I could share with fellow theorists and truth seekers. Here

I’ve also started testing the water and have been sharing droplets from a damn of truth that’s almost ready to burst... such as THIS, I’m hoping that it will help wash away even the highest paid shills that patrol and work these boards. No doubt due to their indoctrination, limited perspective and heavy programming they will suffer cognitive dissonance, once this subsides they will surely be forced to take a really good look at who they are, what they stand for and who/what they are supporting.

Again, thanks for the bump…

reply to post by de1111codEiT


Hi de1111cidEiT,


Thanks for your great webpages, the best thing to do when the Dark Side opposes you is to double up your efforts and make them regret it !


That is some very valid geographical referencing you have done given that the Dark Side uses OCCULT SYMBOLS to demonstrate their Cosmic Allegiance to LUCIFER. The Royals and the Illuminati running Freemasonry from its 33rd Degree are the ones who have done this to us, and who have touted it in plain sight through their Geomantic and Architectural Black Magick.


Godspeed !


Getsmart

Originally posted by de1111codEiT
With this information and figures in mind, it boggles me to think that anyone would not concede that ET is not 'out there' or even 'here' for that matter.

Yeah, except for one little nagging problem. No proof. Not even a tiny bit of reasonably strong evidence that would point in that direction. Sure, the universe is big. But that doesn't automatically guarantee that life is going to pop up everywhere you have liquid water and starshine. We could just be a literally astronomically weird fluke.

That old "where are they" question is a tough one. It's true that we only have a very limited view of what's going on in the universe. But if life is really that prevalent out there, how big a sample do we need to find it? If life is pervasive and tends to spread into every little nook and cranny, it doesn't take long before it becomes obvious. Drop yourself in practically any environment on Earth and you can find life almost immediately. Look out into space, though, and what do we see? Certainly not recognizable life.

Sure, we all like to imagine stuff. And outer space aliens are cool to imagine. But just accepting it as a "given?" It's not scientific or logical at all. At this point, it's just fantasy.

reply to post by Blue Shift


Hi Blue Shift,


I can tell you're rather new here, at least in hours spent researching if not in years spent debunking.


This is a Conspiracy forum and apparently you don't believe in such things. This is manifest in the threads you have started and it appears your role at ATS has been regularly an antagonist one. The debate about evidence is one used to reject anything which isn't already validated by mainstream science.


There are thousands of instances in which evidence which would be admissible in courts of law have been provided by the most reliable eyewitnesses. Just because you were not there yourself and failed to experience what might exist does not mean it doesn't. Only you choose to disbelieve because of prevailing convictions you already hold, which prevent you from considering the evidence present. That is your choice, but please cease invectives to others to disbelieve what evidence they judge reliable.


I've seen an ALIEN in person and can tell you that being a direct eyewitness is far more evidence than most people need. Evidence is what is convincing enough to believe, in the absence of sufficient contradicting evidence to bring you to disbelieve. I am willing to wager that you have ZERO evidence that there is no life outside this planet in our puny Solar system. If you do have evidence to the contrary, please expound.


On a separate note, I find the use of the image of President Abraham Lincoln quite out of place when associated with a closed mind and absence of vision. Lincoln was an inspired Gentleman who was curious about the nature of the world we live in. He was assassinated for his convictions and fell victim to a Conspiracy. This makes his colorized photograph an odd choice for conspiracy theory debunking.


GS