It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Strange UFO claim out of Russia

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 9 2012 @ 11:29 AM
link   

"Sensation Alien spaceship found in Russia Patomskiy Crater Tunguska Event"



Image of crater found in the area of Tunguka.

Strange Crater

How do you get a debris pile like that?

Those are trees BTW otherwise it would look like an ant hill.

I don't speak Russian so I have no idea what they are saying. Maybe someone else here does?



Sensation Alien spaceship found in Russia Patomskiy Crater Tunguska Event

www.youtube.com...



posted on May, 9 2012 @ 11:34 AM
link   
reply to post by Rocketman7
 


The video was uploaded Dec 11, 2010 ..... I'm sure that if there were any truth to it we would be well aware of it by now .



posted on May, 9 2012 @ 11:35 AM
link   
Op was the crater there before impact or was that all caused from incomming? Interesting either way



posted on May, 9 2012 @ 11:40 AM
link   
i remember from a documentary i saw some time ago that

some italian scientists had found the location at the bottom of a lake not to mention that

the original tunguska photo showed massive destruction.Your pic looks like a quarry or something :/



posted on May, 9 2012 @ 11:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
Op was the crater there before impact or was that all caused from incomming? Interesting either way


I guess it is from the incomming. I think that it is deceiving when you look at it from a distance. From a distance each sand grain sized piece does'nt seem to add up to much, but close up each piece is actually a large block of rock.

I suspect it is the usual Russian make believe. But an interesting crater to be sure.



posted on May, 9 2012 @ 01:37 PM
link   
.So it is a puzzle that seems to defy our understanding of how craters, both impact and volcanic, on a relatively small scale are created.

What is apparent from the debris field is that a tremendous force, either a sudden, explosive-like force or a much slower mechanical force (rock-quarry machinery?) reduced the bedrock of that area into small pieces and dust. Given either explanation, we are left with a neatly laid out pile of debris that seems to be only reached by 'copter and definitely would be a rather strange type of quarry.

Since I endlessly promote mass-canceling UFOs here on ATS, I can adapt that concept to this supposed crash area as a possible solution. Suppose that such a powerful UFO ran into trouble and more or less crashed. I say "more or less" because I would suspect that the ship was under propulsion power when it hit and retained its massless state.

Imagine what would happen if an object with no mass ran into something that did. Think in terms of sticking your finger into a sandy beach. The finger actually has a mass, of course, and your weight pushing it deep into the sand. But he point is that the finger remains undamaged, but the sand all around it is forced to move out of the way and the only way it can go is up, around the sides and length of the finger. The result is a neat, small cone around the hole once you remove your finger. Little of the sand moved any distance from the finger.

Our massless ship, however, has no inertia as your finger had, but it is being powered to move forward, and it did, forward into the hillside. Anything that comes into close contact with the ship's field also loses its mass. Yes, even the area of ground directly in front of it, instantaneously. The massless force field of the ship is not much influenced by the amount of material it encounters--solid rock in this instance--yet it is being pushed forward by its drive engine and pushes aside the rock in an explosive manner and continues to a depth where the amount of massless debris slips around the sides the ship. As the ship burrows itself deeper, the debris fills the cavity behind and regains its mass as its distance from the descending ship increases. Eventually, the regained mass of the debris blocks its own movement such that the ship can penetrate no further and becomes stalled and locked into its position.

Surely, that is about how the Russians can claim that there is a ship buried under the broken rock.



posted on May, 9 2012 @ 03:00 PM
link   
It does look a bit like some type of remains from a machine that bores into the center of the earth or something doesn't it?

It seems difficult to understand how something can leave such a neat pile of large crushed boulders.

I came across this video from Russia again, and like so many Russian stories,
it is totally off the wall.

A flying kid in rural Russia.


edit on 9-5-2012 by Rocketman7 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 9 2012 @ 03:47 PM
link   
reply to post by Rocketman7
 


That thread was on ATS a year or so ago.
I don't think it was ever fully explained.



posted on May, 10 2012 @ 01:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by gortex
reply to post by Rocketman7
 


The video was uploaded Dec 11, 2010 ..... I'm sure that if there were any truth to it we would be well aware of it by now .

wait... are they disclosing this type of information now? hmmm i was under the impression it was stll being suppresded...
op: although an intriguing formation, i dont believe there is much creedence to this story.



posted on May, 10 2012 @ 02:10 AM
link   
rofl

the flying russian kid

so wheres the BREAKING russian UFOs?

not stuff from 2010!



posted on May, 10 2012 @ 06:41 PM
link   
I personaly think thats it could of been an astroid? If it was a Ufo id think that it would of been BIG on the news or popular on youtube. But interesting post



new topics

top topics



 
4

log in

join