It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It seems people just cannot get past the "Zombie Apocalypse" theory of collapse. They imagine hordes of disease-ridden folks dressed in rags stumbling around and fighting over cans of petrol and stripping cans of food from shelves. That's not what collapse looks like. It never has been. In fact, there's very little evidence that a Zombie Apocalypse style collapse ever occurred in the historical record. Instead we see subtle patterns of abandonment and decay that unfold over long periods of time. Big projects stop. Population thins. Trade routes shrink and people revert to barter. Things get simpler and more local. Culture coarsens. High art stagnates. People disperse. Expectations are adjusted downward. Investments are no longer made in the future and previous investments are cannibalized just to maintain the status quo. Extend and pretend is hardly a recent invention.
No, what happens in a collapse is very much more subtle than a Zombie Apocalypse. Things tend to look pretty normal for the following reasons:
1.) People and Institutions are resistant to change.
2.) The system has a formidable array of resources to preserve the status quo.
3.) Sheer momentum.
4.) Creeping Normalcy
5.) Denial
link
This is how history says collapses go down, not with a bang, but with a whimper. Based on recent archaeology, it seems this is how the Roman collapse unfolded was well. Although images of pillaging barbarians looting burning cities sticks in people's imaginations when they think of the fall of the Roman Empire, this was not the experience for most people according to recent scholarship. Big events tended to come down to us in the written record, but for ordinary people, it probably seemed much less dramatic.
The difference between such a collapse for Rome and for the world today is that our modern world, America in particular, is so interdependent with so many parts of the world with things like food and manufactured goods travelling very far to reach our shores. The Romans for the most part were much more decentralized in terms of agriculture and manufacturing. Even thought the empire's power and control was waning most people were peasants who only needed locally produced goods and a good harvest every year to survive. Now if the delicate global supply chains get disrupted there is much more to lose. Agriculture is dependent on fertilizer and cheap energy and agricultural machinery which are in turn dependent on global trade. Medicines, iPhones, various bits and pieces that go into everything and much much more would be unable to get to people who need them and who have lived most of their lives with them. If global trade gets disrupted the whole rotten structure of our global society will at least get a good kick, and potentially fall in on itself
Take the video to 9:35 in and play from Meltzers Decoded Ft Nox episode. "Its not whether or not it will happen, its how controlled they can slow the effect.
Groups such as the PNAC group, are causing Global conflicts without regard to the blowback it will cause, in the name of continuing the Empire.
Collapse is well under way, not as planned, but as a by product.
Originally posted by seabag
I wonder if US is a tool for TPTB or the next victim?
Originally posted by Ameilia
reply to post by seabag
I am outraged that Before its News has taken maybe the first 20% of a GREAT ARTICLE, that actually came out of a week ago, and published it, making it look like their work. I do see a link to the ORIGINAL WRITER on there, but it is not credited properly in any way!
The actual article (much longer, more detailed, and worth the read) is located on this unknown blog.
Originally posted by seabag
Originally posted by Ameilia
reply to post by seabag
I am outraged that Before its News has taken maybe the first 20% of a GREAT ARTICLE, that actually came out of a week ago, and published it, making it look like their work. I do see a link to the ORIGINAL WRITER on there, but it is not credited properly in any way!
The actual article (much longer, more detailed, and worth the read) is located on this unknown blog.
Great find!
I had no idea I was quoting a plagiarized article!
I am definitely interested in reading the full text. Thanks!