Occupy Insanity:

sorry, duplicate post.

Originally posted by jjf3rd77

Originally posted by digital01anarchy

The OWS guy makes a point! find him a job. You want people to stop trashing the streets find them jobs. sean tells This OWS guy to pound the pavement, like you can just walk into any place and find a job lol that companies still handout applications when you ask them. The logic of Sean is apparent if you don't have a job your a bum and he doesn't even have a clue about how people get jobs these days "pound pavement" lol.
and you original poster if you dont like it here kick rocks the hell out because we don't want you here as well. Your anti Ron paul which means A) your slow B) brainwashed C) disinfo D) your a democrat .

Ok, what Sean meant by, "Pound the pavement," Is an old time term for going out and searching for the jobs instead of applying to jobs randomly online. That doesn't work, trust me I tried it last year! I applied to over 300 jobs online and not a single one of them replied back. You've gotta use your connections and contacts. Thats how you find a job! Knowing people who know people who know people. Ironically, that's how TPTB works too!

Oh and since when do WE have to help those who refuse to help themselves??

Actually the OWS guy called himself a bum so IDK where you got that from Hannity. I never said I didn't like it here at ATS, I just said the guy belongs here, because I have seen some of those "claims" being posted on here. Don't get emotionally involved in this website please.

Sure I'm anti- Ron Paul. I can think for myself and see through his stupid rhetoric. But If you think for a second that I'm either one of those things you mentioned...you are A) slow B) Brainwashed C) Disinfo D) a liberal

Nice talking to you!

edit on 4-5-2012 by jjf3rd77 because: (no reason given)

Really you think for yourself yet post a video agreeing with sean hannity. I know "pound the pavement" is a term but its outdated and doesn't make sense in this day and age. With online applications being the #1 company go to, how is it you think other people without connections will find a job? I didn't address government as the one who should supply the jobs but given large corporations who used American tax payer money to start up their business then turn around and export the jobs to china while people here have no jobs doesn't make any sense. Sure I'm anti- Ron Paul. I can think for myself and see through his stupid rhetoric? Hows that oh when he predicted the stock market crash or when he knew heading into Iraq was a bad Idea or maybe when he voted against the patriot act lol he backs up his views with evidence in his voting.

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein

Same rhetoric Ameircans have heard for the past 100 years Wilson,Roosevelt,Huey Long,liberals,Democrats,socialists,marxists, and communists have been spewing since before most of us were born.

So they keep doing the same things over and over aigain Occupy 1.0 now Occupy 2.0 doing those same things saying the same things and they really do expect a different result.

That dude on Hannity is the classic example of the trophy for showing up in life.

Originally posted by digital01anarchy


Really you think for yourself yet post a video agreeing with sean hannity. I know "pound the pavement" is a term but its outdated and doesn't make sense in this day and age. With online applications being the #1 company go to, how is it you think other people without connections will find a job? I didn't address government as the one who should supply the jobs but given large corporations who used American tax payer money to start up their business then turn around and export the jobs to china while people here have no jobs doesn't make any sense. Sure I'm anti- Ron Paul. I can think for myself and see through his stupid rhetoric? Hows that oh when he predicted the stock market crash or when he knew heading into Iraq was a bad Idea or maybe when he voted against the patriot act lol he backs up his views with evidence in his voting.

So I cannot agree with Hannity but you can agree with RP??? Some logic there. We are both listening to different people who happen to be RIGHT about certain things, albeit sometimes very very different things. RP actually supported the OWS crowd, and the OWS crowd supported him too!

I want you to name large corporations funded by the gov't which used taxpayers money. Please provide facts to back up your sensationalist anarchistic claims. Oh I get it now! Are you that guy in the video, because you are the only person on this thread defending him. If not, than you sound just as incoherent as he does!

Originally posted by neo96

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein

So they keep doing the same things over and over aigain Occupy 1.0 now Occupy 2.0 doing those same things saying the same things and they really do expect a different result.

I like that Occupy 1.0 and 2.0. Its like software releases

Originally posted by jjf3rd77

Sure I'm anti- Ron Paul. I can think for myself and see through his stupid rhetoric. But If you think for a second that I'm either one of those things you mentioned...you are A) slow B) Brainwashed C) Disinfo D) a liberal

Ron Paul "rhetoric??? And please tell me ONE SINGLE politician out there who is better than Paul. Just give me ONE.

And that Anti-Ron Paul link in your signature has got to be the biggest bunch of silly nonsense that I have ever read in my life. Its as if a delusional 6 year old spoiled brat wrote it. Do you REALLY stand by that link enough to put it in your signature??

Originally posted by HangTheTraitors

Ron Paul "rhetoric??? And please tell me ONE SINGLE politician out there who is better than Paul. Just give me ONE.

That is the type of rhetoric I am talking about...Now can we please get back on topic to the stupid Occupy guy. there is a huge problem of people derailing threads here!!!!

I don't think the guy did very well and I don't like the idea of people speaking for the movement especially on a "conservative" talk show, that said Hannity per usual was a rude prick, if you're going to ask a question the polite thing to do is wait for the answer not pile on 10 more questions. That is not debate or discussion it's just ill manners.

Originally posted by Kali74
I don't think the guy did very well and I don't like the idea of people speaking for the movement especially on a "conservative" talk show, that said Hannity per usual was a rude prick, if you're going to ask a question the polite thing to do is wait for the answer not pile on 10 more questions. That is not debate or discussion it's just ill manners.

I think after the free free free stuff that's all Hannity or I could bare from the guy. He deserved ten spit fire questions after that stupid remark!

reply to post by jjf3rd77


I agree that his behavior, demeanor, and dodging of his questions, as well as "the NYPD sent rapists" he kind of broke Hannity. I mean I can't imagine that he drops the F bomb on air very often as he did in this video. To me that is a sign that he got pushed over the edge.

Also, I am curious why you dislike Ron Paul so. I am not going to try to change your opinion, and you will likely not sway mine, but I am curious as to what your reasons are.

LOL this guy seems drunk or high. His speech is slightly slurred. Not a good talking head at ALL.

Shame, needs to be fired.

reply to post by jjf3rd77


Ok lets agree with videos time and its from fox news

Also I read your link and this is what i think of it

Originally posted by jjf3rd77
Sean Hannity's anticipated interview with OWS leader Harrison Schultz:

Fail.

Occupy is a global, leaderless, organic movement. There are a billion and one opinions, because it's made up of free-thinking individuals rather than brainwashed party-driven sheep.

You can try to paint all protesters as "commies" and "lefties" all you like. People have woken up to the same BS from the corporate news (hence their massive 50% decline), and they won't take much notice from some random right-winger on a forum either.

People know that the parties are the same. Look at their actions when in office and you cannot deny it. They are led, not leaders, just like those who mindlessly cheer-lead for their "clan".

Originally posted by detachedindividual

Originally posted by jjf3rd77
Sean Hannity's anticipated interview with OWS leader Harrison Schultz:

Occupy is a global, leaderless, organic movement. There are a billion and one opinions, because it's made up of free-thinking individuals rather than brainwashed party-driven sheep.

That's...Hilarious. Also, if OWS really was leaderless, why do they let this guy make a fool of himself on national TV??? Doesn't make sense to me!

Originally posted by Mkoll
reply to post by jjf3rd77

 

Also, I am curious why you dislike Ron Paul so. I am not going to try to change your opinion, and you will likely not sway mine, but I am curious as to what your reasons are.

edit on 4-5-2012 by Mkoll because: (no reason given)

Read the link in my signature. All my questions are there and you can PM me any responses you have I am trying to not get this thread derailed.

reply to post by jjf3rd77


How can they control him from going on the show? I'm sure he was paid an appearance fee.

reply to post by digital01anarchy


Even though I opened this bottle of worms (should have PM'd in the first place I guess) I think that it is impolite that he asks us not to derail his thread and then you go and post this trying to provoke a debate on it.

Originally posted by Mkoll
reply to post by digital01anarchy

 

Even though I opened this bottle of worms (should have PM'd in the first place I guess) I think that it is impolite that he asks us not to derail his thread and then you go and post this trying to provoke a debate on it.

HA It's clear he is an anarchist shill! Brought here to spread anarchist rhetoric and to repost my blog post for useless reasons.... The mods must be out partying tonight as I have alterted them about two of his posts and they haven't censored the messages yet. Please keep this about OWS, and Anarchy still hasn't answered my questions, just "hating on me"

Lots of shills and golden spoons in this thread, as per usual. You say you can't take what this interviewee says seriously, well, that's pretty much how I feel about the rest of you. Are you reading from a script or something? Be less obvious.