It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
He has a ton of great photos and info that supports the Geoengineering theory of the Chemtrail phenomenon.
First of all this thread is about geoengineering, not chemtrails. Chemtrails is the term those who want to avoid addressing geoengineering use to make people sound crazy.
You think everyone in the government would flip the instant they discovered the truth ? No they have families, careers, and life to worry about.
No they have families,
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by Witness2008
Too bad:
Nicely done ....
This is not true.
But, when you are "less lazy"???
No what he is saying, and I agree, is that the term "Chemtrails" is misleading because the "Chemtrails" may actually just be water with dust or other ice attracting particulate to create artificial clouds to Geoengineer.
If you google chemtrails you get conspiracy.
If you google geoengineering you get hard science. Let's stick to geoengineering here please.
No.. the stewardesses do.
I say again... Chemtrails are not out to kill you. Lets everyone get past this. Chemtrails are not chemicals for population control. Patents and documents have shown methods for creating Albedo altering artificial clouds using a wide variety of particulates mixed with water at high altitudes.
Originally posted by bacci0909
Originally posted by ProudBird
Just think logically!!!!edit on Sun 29 April 2012 by ProudBird because: (no reason given)
You just said a mouthful.
Logical thinking would also entail looking up at the sky and remembering that our skies have not always looked like this
Originally posted by DakotaCensus
Is there anything implicating Lockheed Martin in any of these Chemtrail suspicions? They share some board members with DuPont, who have a long history of shady dealings.
Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by AllSeeingI
Well if you enjoyed that thread then you must read this one...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
or maybe even this one...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
You have no idea what you are talking about. I am a pilot.
Antioxidants to prevent gumming, usually based on alkylated phenols, e.g., AO-30, AO-31, or AO-37;
Antistatic agents, to dissipate static electricity and prevent sparking; Stadis 450, with dinonylnaphthylsulfonic acid (DINNSA) as the active ingredient, is an example
Corrosion inhibitors, e.g., DCI-4A used for civilian and military fuels, and DCI-6A used for military fuels;
Fuel system icing inhibitor (FSII) agents, e.g., Di-EGME; FSII is often mixed at the point-of-sale so that users with heated fuel lines do not have to pay the extra expense.
Biocides are to remediate microbial (i.e., bacterial and fungal) growth present in aircraft fuel systems. Currently, two biocides are approved for use by most aircraft and turbine engine original equipment manufacturers (OEMs); Kathon FP1.5 Microbiocide and Biobor JF.[10]
Metal deactivator can be added to remediate the deleterious effects of trace metals on the thermal stability of the fuel. The one allowable additive is N,N’-disalicylidene 1,2-propanediamine.
And logical thinking would have a logical person conclude the reason for that might possibly be.................increased air traffic? Or do deny the existence of contrails?
Originally posted by Witness2008
reply to post by AllSeeingI
I have and will always agree with this statement
I say again... Chemtrails are not out to kill you. Lets everyone get past this. Chemtrails are not chemicals for population control. Patents and documents have shown methods for creating Albedo altering artificial clouds using a wide variety of particulates mixed with water at high altitudes.
After I had read Edward Tellers 1997 Study and proposal, I was pretty much convinced that plowing our skies was mostly geo-engineering. In 2003 when I first started looking into what those big X's could be, I was reading some pretty horrific stuff. It never made sense to me the whole depopulation thing. I could never bring myself to think that there could be such sinister forces at work and so many folks willing to go along.
Originally posted by AllSeeingI
reply to post by tsurfer2000h
Regarding the Chemtrail believers are acting immorally thread:
His insinuation and basis of his thread is ridiculous.
If this is a High level military and or government and or corporate operation that is being kept secret for some reason, we have no more ability to disclose with evidence than if, as a civilian with no security clearance, infiltrate the FBI or CIA and steal some Top Secret files.
The aircraft would be launched from military bases (cannot penetrate legally).
The clouds are injected into high altitudes 30-50 thousand feet ... and remain at altitude.
Sure let me just run down to the airport borrow an aircraft capable of those altitudes and fly up and follow one of these flights. Oh yeah... by the way dont forget that all airspace is controlled above 18000 and you must fly EXACTLY where they tell you to fly or you will be breaking regulations of the FAA and criminal codes.
- FAA's designation of airspace classes
(a) CLASS A AIRSPACE AREA. Generally, that airspace from 18,000 feet MSL up to and including FL 600, including the airspace overlying the waters within 12 nautical miles (NM) of the coast of the 48 contiguous States and Alaska. Unless otherwise authorized, all persons must operate their aircraft under IFR.
So you see its not that simple...
Please discuss any and all Chemtrail points. I have answers for any attempt at a final debunking. I have yet to see any proof that refutes the possibility of such a Chemtrail program or research.
Why not consider that chemtrails are supposedly being sprayed by civilian planes, all over the world, every day, and yet there is not one single piece of verifiable evidence to support their existence. not one credible whistleblower. not one "secret" paper, not one bill of lading, not one unexplained truck filling up an aircraft with an unknown substance, not one fuel sample containing anything untoward, not one ground handler with an MSDS for whatever it is that the "chem" supposedly is.
Originally posted by burntheships
reply to post by AllSeeingI
Nice find ASI!
I am also of the mind that the term "Chemtrails" was introduced with the sole intent
of distraction from the real information that was available over a decade ago,
under the term "Geoengineering".