It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Human0815
reply to post by Bakatono
You know that the Flight to SE-Asia and Return will be like
ca. 83 Days here in Tokyo
Radiation Flight New York-Tokyo- New York
will be ca 200 Microsievert,
at the moment we have ca. 0.10 Microsievert per Hour this is 2.4 Microsievert a Day
knowledge.allianz.com.../radiation-threat-nuclear-fallout-harmfuledit on 25-4-2012 by Human0815 because: (no reason given)
"I would probably be hesitant to eat a lot of those fish," said Nicholas Fisher, a marine sciences professor at the State University of New York at Stony Brook.
Cesium was especially prevalent in certain of the species:
• 73 per cent of mackerel tested
• 91 per cent of the halibut
• 92 per cent of the sardines
• 93 per cent of the tuna and eel
• 94 per cent of the cod and anchovies
• 100 per cent of the carp, seaweed, shark and monkfish
Originally posted by Xaphan
Okay, there's one thing I still don't understand. Why isn't the mainstream news media in North America or Europe covering this? Are they avoiding this whole thing out of fear of causing a widespread panic calamity?
It should be no surprise that the corporate controlled mainstream media is ignoring this blockbuster revelation instead of exposing it and demanding an investigation.
“By Sunday March 13th, Elliot Brenner, sent out an e-mail to upper NRC counterparts clearly narrating the sequence of events. ‘While we know more than what these (press releases) say, we’re sticking to this story for now.’ writes Breener, during the weekend he labled [labeled] ‘very hectic’.”
“Yet another caution to limit information given to the public and a heads-up to ‘Expect the public/media focus to turn toward domestic in the next day or so.’ IOW, by the afternoon of March 12 the NRC was in full ass-covering mode for the U.S. nuclear industry.”
Originally posted by nukeworker
reply to post by PageAlaCearl
Not trying to downplay what has happened but , I work on reactors and background radiation has had NO change from before or after Japans event . I could tell you things that would send you spinning but due to who I work for I cant , sorry . In no way am I a troll or sent here for some dissinformation campaighn . I just find it funny how people freak out over this . Waste has been dumped for years by a lots of different people . I guess what I am trying to say is this was nothing new ! I will agree with you nuclear power is not the best option , but its out of my hands . Trust me I monitor the levels as I have children myself and I do live in the Northwest of the USA , anyway take care .
Originally posted by randyvs
Why hasn't the MSM given us any coverage at all would be a better question. The silence speaks volumes.
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by Xaphan
Why hasn't the MSM given us any coverage at all would be a better question. The silence speaks volumes.
Originally posted by Erectus
I have an idea. Since Fukushima is apparently thousands of times more harmful to the environment than all the nuclear weapons testing ever done on Earth, why don't we just drop a 10 megaton nuke on the plant? Doesn't that after all duplicate the sun?
Come on people.
The people aren't dead in Japan because this isn't the end of the Northern hemisphere like people on here seem so desperate to believe.
Originally posted by jadedANDcynical
Here's the thing about Geiger counters:
Geiger counters are used to detect ionizing radiation, usually beta particles and gamma rays, but certain models can detect alpha particles.
Wiki
While Gamma and Beta are higher energy particles, it is the alpha emitters (isotopes of plutonium for example) that are really troubling. Most devices will not even detect these and some particular radionuclides can only be found through extensive lab testing.
In order to get an accurate measurement of how much radiation you are exposed to in any given area, you would need be able to examine minutely each and every square millimeter of exposed surface and countless cubic meters of air due to the random nature of the spread of the pollution.
Picture a stream of smoke off of the end of a cigarette and you have some idea of what we are dealing with here regarding the way these contaminants behave.
The aersolized particulates are sub-micron sized and are respirable (that is they would pass through the membranes in your lungs and enter your bloodstream) and depending on which particular isotope lodge in a different portion of your body.
Iodine seeks your thyroid gland, strontium is a bone seeker, and each of the other isotopes go to muscle or other organs. Luckily, the vast majority of the airborne releases peaked after the explosions of R3 & R4, but the waterborne release still continue and are exceedingly difficult to quantify.
If another big aftershock hits (and remember, there still has not been a M8+ sized quake which is still in the cards) and if the SFP (spent fuel pool) of R4 is spilled, then we are all in a much deeper pile of poo than we are presently in.
There is no way to avoid what is in the environment at this point, the best you can do is limit your exposure and hope for the best.
Originally posted by BaronAlbatross
Originally posted by nukeworker
reply to post by PageAlaCearl
Not trying to downplay what has happened but , I work on reactors and background radiation has had NO change from before or after Japans event . I could tell you things that would send you spinning but due to who I work for I cant , sorry . In no way am I a troll or sent here for some dissinformation campaighn . I just find it funny how people freak out over this . Waste has been dumped for years by a lots of different people . I guess what I am trying to say is this was nothing new ! I will agree with you nuclear power is not the best option , but its out of my hands . Trust me I monitor the levels as I have children myself and I do live in the Northwest of the USA , anyway take care .
Although the current situation is anything but ideal being as it is among the most significant recent catastrophes, I would also like to remind readers that since the creation of atomic weaponry there have been over 2000 documented detonations worldwide. I also do not seek to downplay the severity of uncontained nuclear reactions but to ask the question of our planet's durability. I think it is necessary to consider the effects of previous distributions of radiation and determine in a more quantifiable and less speculative manner just what this means for life on our planet. Its obvious that we're not all dead or dying in droves over this specifically, but sickness increases when this type of event occurs. I say as long as we are not dead we still have the chance to heal ourselves, or at least rectify the situation or help others prepare for the effects.