It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by guavas
A lot of good ideas there.
One thing that I am not sure about is this:
For the ones smart enough to ask questions, they instituted the standard 40 hour work week to keep us too busy and tired from scrambling around to ask questions.
I thought the 40 hour workweek came about through the increased power of the workforce due to the advancement of labor unions. Before the rise of the unions, workweeks were much longer.
Originally posted by Starchild23
reply to post by deviloshdoughnuts
Holy (insert expletive here), I hadn't thought of that.
However, I really think that those civilizations have nothing to do with modern society...except as something that our current leaders are exerting every ounce of effort in resisting. See, the "gods" (aliens) had contact with those people and gave them lots of stuff...
Unfortunately, due to the structure of our reality, those all died off. Additionally, some people were just jerks and toppled the system.
What we have here is the government deciding it's easier to promote slavery in the clothes of freedom, than giving us freedom on a platter and spending tons of their pocket money to ensure that we don't force them to slavery.
The big question here is: if given the option, can we govern ourselves? Or will we end up falling just like every other empire?
Originally posted by Blaine91555
reply to post by Meaningless
Theoretically your ideas are sound, but in reality you have failed to factor in human behavior. Anarchy always leads to rule by the strongest, who may be and often are the most brutal and evil people in society. With no system to protect against them, they will always prevail...
Are you encouraging Big Brother to raise its ugly head behind the curtain?
Originally posted by mecheng
reply to post by Starchild23
I actually think you and I are close... Our "leaders" as you call them, have slowly (if 200+ years is slow) been replaced by greedy immoral people in it for their own profit. The greedy have pecked away at the original system until it has been rendered unrecognizable.
My point with respect to the OP is I don't think we are where we are now because of some "master plan" that has been set in place and followed by a select few - as much as because the system has evolved to where we are due to the fact that... Simply put, the greedy want it more!
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
Originally posted by Blaine91555
reply to post by Meaningless
Theoretically your ideas are sound, but in reality you have failed to factor in human behavior. Anarchy always leads to rule by the strongest, who may be and often are the most brutal and evil people in society. With no system to protect against them, they will always prevail...
Exactly.
If you put a bunch of people in a room together, or on an island together, for an extended period of time to fend for themselves, those people would create their own problems amongst themselves, even devoid of government involvement.
I truly doubt the world would be some happy place where everyone holds hands and sings "Kumbaya" if there were no form of government.
I'm not saying that individual people are all necessarily bad, but humanity as a whole is notoriously competitive. Competing for food; competing for shelter; competing for a mate; and just competing in general.
Originally posted by Meaningless
reply to post by Blaine91555
Too many people want peace and no one wants to be told what to do. We keep order by keeping order in ourselves, not in the hands of some government. It is absolutely possible to live in local communities, uniting together and swaying off any intruders attempting to gain control. Do you even know what dictates behavior in humans?
Wouldn't need to compete for food if we simply plant gardens all over for people to freely pick from. Shelters are easily made and could be available to all. Competing for a mate lol. You guys have no clue how life would be without government.
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
reply to post by Meaningless
I'm not saying that individual people are all necessarily bad, but humanity as a whole is notoriously competitive. Competing for food; competing for shelter; competing for a mate; and just competing in general.
Originally posted by Ketzer22
I especially liked the part about how the government must continue finding/creating problems in order to perpetuate its existence.. I never thought of it that way. It makes perfect sense though- along the lines of why they declared a war on drugs- they know they can never "solve" the drug problem, but they sure can soak up even more tax dollars in the name of it. Great OP.
Enlighten me.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
Originally posted by Meaningless
reply to post by Blaine91555
Too many people want peace and no one wants to be told what to do. We keep order by keeping order in ourselves, not in the hands of some government. It is absolutely possible to live in local communities, uniting together and swaying off any intruders attempting to gain control. Do you even know what dictates behavior in humans?
Yes I do Do you
Originally posted by loveguy
I've had to share a lock-up once with a bunch of illegals. One thing I noticed was that when rations were given; cookies or whatever the cops felt like throwing in our cage on the way to the dumpster...
It didn't matter who of these illegals got their hands on which goodies; they would hand it off to the eldest, and he would make sure that everyone got their portion. Even a gringo such as myself!
So to think we are incapable of governing ourselves is drinking the pee that we are told is coolaid, and good for us; absolutely ludicrous!