Would you rather be a US puppet or dead?

Did U.S.-based mercenaries in Libya assist in the assassination of Col. Muammar Qadaffi
see americanfreepress.net...

Now I was no fan of Qadaffi but if he was really that bad of a dude his own people would have taken him out without outside assistance. The use of mercenaries in no way absolves the US from having interfered in the internal affairs of a foreign country contrary to international law but at which we excel be it wet (blood) or dry (bribes).

By the way Qadaffi paid the Carter admin (thru whiz on the tarmac brother Billy) a princely sum to be able to sell oil to the US. When Reagan assumed office and wanted his 'gift' Quadaffi balked and got a missile attack in return and later a disastrous CIA attempt to shoot his plane down. The missile hit the wrong plane and killed hundreds of civilians.

The entire 'Arab spring' smells. Whose agenda is it and what is that agenda? Expanding our sphere of influence to get oil and/or contain Russia? I expect the entire plan will backfire with radicals assuming power or could that be the agenda.

the gold dinar is why he was killed, had nothing to do with how he ran the country. the US govt is the largest terrorist organization in the world and it's getting blatantly obvious for even sleepy citizens to see.

Dead.

hahaha nice thread lol... and most probably the 2nd option.


and yeah he was killed because of the gold dinar currency he was trying to bring into africa to fairly distribute the wealth throughout africa (which most african countries had agreed to participate in by the way), which was going to be in direct competition to the euro and the dollar. and also because he was exposing the us and israel.