Computer programmer admits to rigging vote machines... (VIDEO)

I was looking up vidoes about rigged vote machines and found this.. I have a very big feeling that the caucas (idk how to spell it, sorry. ) I just think this video is very shocking, we have some evidence right there! Is there a way to make them hand count the votes in public?? It's obvious its rigged because they now choose to count them in private :/ ... Can we make a petition to ask them to hand count them in public?

www.youtube.com...

We all know it's happening but this was the video that came out after Bush stole his election with rigged voting.

Hand counting truly is the only way to go.

Peace

reply to post by jude11


Yea i knew that but if they did that in the real elections, then they would definitly do it in the caucus.. I wish they could just be honest and not rigg the votes.. Hand counting is the only way to go! How we do make them hand count it? Im only 15 but I'm really into politics and this makes me really sad that they would rigg it....

Since computer programming is more of an ArtForm than anything else, it would be obvious to assume that a computer programmer would more likely be a Democrat.

So why would they rig elections for the other side?

reply to post by arber123

This is an incredible video of a Congressional hearing that exposes the ease of rigging electronic voting results.

Here is the Wiki bio of Clinton Eugene Curtis, the man making the testimony in the video;

Clinton Eugene "Clint" Curtis (born 1958 near Salem, Illinois) is a United States computer programmer[1] and ex employee of NASA and ExxonMobil, currently living in Northern California, who worked for Yang Enterprises (YEI) in Oviedo, Florida until February 2001. He is notable chiefly for making a series of "whistleblower" allegations about his former employer and about Republican Congressman Tom Feeney, including an allegation that in 2000, Feeney and Yang Enterprises requested Curtis's assistance in a scheme to steal votes by inserting fraudulent code into touch screen voting systems.

This was in relation to the Florida vote rigging allegations, which was where the electronic vote went to Bush even though the exit polls heavily favored Gore, and the Florida Supreme court refused to allow a hand-recount of the ballots.

This guy presents matter-of-fact damning evidence of vote rigging by his company.

The 2004 Ohio election is another matter, that was where election results were re-routed to a private server before going to the Ohio AG's office. The server was operated by Republican operative Mike Connelly who died in a suspect plane crash.

The Florida electronic vote machine were made by Diebold, where the Diebold CEO infamously declared he would deliver the vote to Bush. It's also where strange vote tabulations were being noted as they occurred, such as:

Diebold Memos Disclose Florida 2000 E-Voting Fraud

"DELAND, Fla., Nov. 11 - Something very strange happened on election night to Deborah Tannenbaum, a Democratic Party official in Volusia County. At 10 p.m., she called the county elections department and learned that Al Gore was leading George W. Bush 83,000 votes to 62,000. But when she checked the county's Web site for an update half an hour later, she found a startling development: Gore's count had dropped by 16,000 votes, while an obscure Socialist candidate had picked up 10,000--all because of a single precinct with only 600 voters."

reply to post by jude11

We all know it's happening but this was the video that came out after Bush stole his election with rigged voting.

Hand counting truly is the only way to go.

Unfortunately, hand recounting of electronic voting is now impossible. See the points made in this article (while the article refers to one state's system - Washington, they are all nearly identical):

(WA) 2/12 - REBUTTALS TO CANNED TALKING POINTS ABOUT VOTING MACHINES (Blackboxvoting.org)

REBUTTALS TO WASHINGTON STATE'S TALKING POINTS ABOUT VOTING MACHINES

TALKING POINT: We have a state law that requires every electronic voting machine to have a paper backup, referred to as a Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail.

THE TRUTH: The public is not allowed to examine the paper trail.

TALKING POINT: After each election, each county randomly chooses up to 4% of their electronic voting machines for an audit, where they compare the electronic votes to the paper audit trail for three races to verify that they match.

THE TRUTH: This is not an audit, it is a spot check, and it is controlled by the same people who program the system and control chain of custody for absentee ballots.

TALKING POINT: All paper trails can withstand multiple recounts or audits, and the image will last up to seven years.

THE TRUTH: That's nice, but the public is not permitted to examine these ballots, ever, even after the election and all recount and contest periods have expired.

The article covers many more points than what I quoted above. One look at the vote manipulation in the Maine caucus should be all it takes to realize how fraudulent electronic voting is. Made worse by the fact that the people gaming the vote are the same ones we ask to do any recounts or audits... sigh.




reply to post by Alxandro

Since computer programming is more of an ArtForm than anything else, it would be obvious to assume that a computer programmer would more likely be a Democrat.

So, according to your logic, all computer programmers are Democrats? You know what happens when you make assumptions.

Here is another good video on electronic voting fraud.

Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
reply to post by arber123

 

reply to post by Alxandro

 

Since computer programming is more of an ArtForm than anything else, it would be obvious to assume that a computer programmer would more likely be a Democrat.

So, according to your logic, all computer programmers are Democrats? You know what happens when you make assumptions.

But all we hear from Dems is that Repubs don't have brains or logic for anything of any importance.
Now all of a sudden they are far superior computer programmers?
How can that be?

reply to post by arber123


If you watch the video , this guy testifying wrote the program in. 2000. I have been saying for years that Obama was appointed not elected , for Obama to win right wing republican mid western saes is total bull cucka . Satan and his NWO has taken over putting his people wherever and whenever he wants.