It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Private investors and Indian tribes are proposing 22 new casinos across lower Michigan, and metro Detroit is clearly among the targets of the gambling gold rush.
Hopefuls are wagering -- against long odds -- on plans that could make them millions of dollars while also nearly doubling the number of casinos in the state. Six organizations want in on the game -- two investor groups separately seeking state constitutional amendments and four tribes trying to expand off-reservation gambling.
Opposition's viewpoint
James Nye, a spokesman for a coalition of tribes and Detroit casinos preparing to fight the Michigan First effort, said his group is ready to raise $50 million to stop the new casinos. The group, Protect MI Vote, says casino expansion would circumvent state voters' approval in 2004 of a constitutional amendment requiring both statewide approval of non-tribal casino expansion and approval of local voters where a casino would locate.
Nye's group represents the MGM Grand Detroit and Greektown casinos and two tribes: the Saginaw Chippewa, which own Soaring Eagle in Mt. Pleasant, and the Nottawaseppi Huron Band, which owns FireKeepers Casino near Battle Creek. Nye said Michigan First wants to write its eight casinos into the state constitution, exempting them from the strict Michigan regulatory oversight required for the existing Detroit casinos.
"They are really unbelievably brazen with their plan to sell off pieces of our constitution to their investors," Nye said. "Worst of all, there is no transparency," he said, adding that it remains possible for any amendment that goes before voters to not include the names of the casino owners.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by usmc0311
It's possible that it would attract tourism.. I know all the casinos out here do exceptionally well. I never understood it personally.. I get going to Vegas, I love Vegas, but I never had a desire to drive to a Casino just to blow some money..
They say it "helps the economy" but in reality the only new money would be tourist, and it will place an added financial strain on those that become addicted.
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by usmc0311
I am opposed to indian tribes establishing casinos because it encourages a culture of excessive gambling, crime and fraud.
I think allowing indians to enrich themselves through small-business development (as opposed to casinos) is a better approach.
And yes, this whole act is suspect. Sounds like the State of Michigan would gladly sell off parts of its' constitution to the highest bidder. Not a good thing.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by usmc0311
I would say it attracts out of state / convention visitors.
Michigan is also a major corridor for traffic moving between the Us and Canada so its not out of the realm of possibility for Canadians to come over and spend some cash. Even mroe so since the Canadian dollar is on par if not worth more than the US dollar lately.